Friday, 17 May 2013

Re: Ronald Regan's 31 YOLO moments.

I don't recall him actually saying he lied
---
of course he wouldn't . How often do you see liars admit their lies?

On March 4, 1987, he said, 'a few months ago I told the Americans that
I did not trade arms for hostages .... my heart and my best intentions
tell me it's true but the facts of the evidence tell me it's not."

On May 17, 12:15 pm, Brian Bednarek <bri...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I don't recall him actually saying he lied (I couldn't get audio on this
> either) ... here's an interesting read:
>
> http://www.brown.edu/Research/Understanding_the_Iran_Contra_Affair/pr...
>
> On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 12:53 PM, plainolamerican <plainolameri...@gmail.com
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > wrote:
> >  nothing less than revisionist
> > history, smear, and probably far left extremist rhetoric and spin, if
> > not
> > flat out treason.
> > ---
> > it's Raygun Ronnie admitting he lied about the Iran-Contra Affair.
>
> > On May 17, 9:46 am, Keith In Tampa <keithinta...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > For some reason, the sound is not working on this You Tube clip for me.
> > > Just as well....I feel confident that this is nothing less than
> > revisionist
> > > history, smear, and probably far left extremist rhetoric and spin, if not
> > > flat out treason.
>
> > > On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 10:37 AM, plainolamerican <
> > plainolameri...@gmail.com
>
> > > > wrote:
> > > >http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eHXq8TRejow
>
> > > > On May 16, 10:13 am, Bear Bear <thatbear...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > I had to look it up.
>
> > > > > YOLO stands for You Only Live Once.
>
> > > > > Some good funny pics. A bit of a stroll down memory lane.
>
> > > > >http://www.buzzfeed.com/bennyjohnson/ronald-reagan-yolo
>
> > > > > Bear
>
> > > > --
> > > > --
> > > > Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
> > > > For options & help seehttp://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
>
> > > > * Visit our other community athttp://www.PoliticalForum.com/
> > > > * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
> > > > * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
>
> > > > ---
> > > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> > Groups
> > > > "PoliticalForum" group.
> > > > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
> > an
> > > > email to politicalforum+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
> > > > For more options, visithttps://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>
> > --
> > --
> > Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
> > For options & help seehttp://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
>
> > * Visit our other community athttp://www.PoliticalForum.com/
> > * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
> > * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
>
> > ---
> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> > "PoliticalForum" group.
> > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> > email to politicalforum+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
> > For more options, visithttps://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>
> --
> brinehttp://brineb.blogspot.com/

--
--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "PoliticalForum" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to politicalforum+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Re: Ronald Regan's 31 YOLO moments.

Just didn't happen
---
According to the Report of the Congressional Committees Investigating
the Iran-Contra Affair issued in November 1987, the sale of U.S. arms
to Iran through Israel began in the summer of 1985, after receiving
the approval of President Reagan. The report shows that Israel's
involvement was stimulated by separate overtures in 1985 from Iranian
arms merchant Manucher Ghorbanifar and National Security Council (NSC)
consultant Michael Ledeen, the latter working for National Security
Adviser Robert McFarlane. When Ledeen asked Prime Minister Shimon
Peres for assistance, the Israeli leader agreed to sell weapons to
Iran at America's behest, providing the sale had high-level U.S.
approval.
Before the Israelis would participate, says the report, they demanded
"a clear, express and binding consent by the U.S. Government."
McFarlane told the Congressional committee he first received President
Reagan's approval in July 1985. In August, Reagan again orally
authorized the first sale of weapons to Iran.

On May 17, 12:11 pm, Keith In Tampa <keithinta...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I assume you mean President Ronald Reagan, and President Reagan never
> admitted to lying.....President Reagan did not lie regarding the events
> surrounding the Iran and arms for the Contras.
>
> Just didn't happen Plain Ol'.  As much as you and your far left extremist
> friends continue to try and paint it that way.
>
> On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 12:53 PM, plainolamerican <plainolameri...@gmail.com
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > wrote:
> >  nothing less than revisionist
> > history, smear, and probably far left extremist rhetoric and spin, if
> > not
> > flat out treason.
> > ---
> > it's Raygun Ronnie admitting he lied about the Iran-Contra Affair.
>
> > On May 17, 9:46 am, Keith In Tampa <keithinta...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > For some reason, the sound is not working on this You Tube clip for me.
> > > Just as well....I feel confident that this is nothing less than
> > revisionist
> > > history, smear, and probably far left extremist rhetoric and spin, if not
> > > flat out treason.
>
> > > On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 10:37 AM, plainolamerican <
> > plainolameri...@gmail.com
>
> > > > wrote:
> > > >http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eHXq8TRejow
>
> > > > On May 16, 10:13 am, Bear Bear <thatbear...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > I had to look it up.
>
> > > > > YOLO stands for You Only Live Once.
>
> > > > > Some good funny pics. A bit of a stroll down memory lane.
>
> > > > >http://www.buzzfeed.com/bennyjohnson/ronald-reagan-yolo
>
> > > > > Bear
>
> > > > --
> > > > --
> > > > Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
> > > > For options & help seehttp://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
>
> > > > * Visit our other community athttp://www.PoliticalForum.com/
> > > > * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
> > > > * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
>
> > > > ---
> > > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> > Groups
> > > > "PoliticalForum" group.
> > > > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
> > an
> > > > email to politicalforum+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
> > > > For more options, visithttps://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>
> > --
> > --
> > Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
> > For options & help seehttp://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
>
> > * Visit our other community athttp://www.PoliticalForum.com/
> > * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
> > * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
>
> > ---
> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> > "PoliticalForum" group.
> > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> > email to politicalforum+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
> > For more options, visithttps://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

--
--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "PoliticalForum" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to politicalforum+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Re: Minnesota 12th State to Legalize Same-Sex Marriage

keep your word, marriage ... but stop persecuting gays. It's very
unbecoming.


On May 17, 2:18 pm, Keith In Tampa <keithinta...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Wrong, and herein lies the problem.   Marriage is an eccleisastical
> function.  Anything performed by the government, and sometimes termed as
> "Secular Marriage"  is nothing more, and nothing less than a civil union,
> period.
>
> On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 3:14 PM, plainolamerican
> <plainolameri...@gmail.com>wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > nobody is asking the state to change the definition of marriage.
> > what's in question is equal rights for gays.
> > persecuting someone because of sexual preference seems quite archaic
> > and that's exactly what jewish/christian/muzzy religious doctrine
> > promotes.
>
> > On May 17, 12:25 pm, Keith In Tampa <keithinta...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > But then there's those other 39 states which have either passed a
> > > Constitutional Amendment, or provided by statue the prohibition against
> > > modifying the definition of Marriage.
>
> > > On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 1:21 PM, plainolamerican
> > > <plainolameri...@gmail.com>wrote:
>
> > > >http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/05/14/minnesota-gay-marriage-legal.
> > ..
>
> > > > --
> > > > --
> > > > Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
> > > > For options & help seehttp://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
>
> > > > * Visit our other community athttp://www.PoliticalForum.com/
> > > > * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
> > > > * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
>
> > > > ---
> > > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> > Groups
> > > > "PoliticalForum" group.
> > > > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
> > an
> > > > email to politicalforum+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
> > > > For more options, visithttps://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>
> > --
> > --
> > Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
> > For options & help seehttp://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
>
> > * Visit our other community athttp://www.PoliticalForum.com/
> > * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
> > * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
>
> > ---
> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> > "PoliticalForum" group.
> > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> > email to politicalforum+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
> > For more options, visithttps://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

--
--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "PoliticalForum" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to politicalforum+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Re: Minnesota 12th State to Legalize Same-Sex Marriage

Wrong, and herein lies the problem.   Marriage is an eccleisastical function.  Anything performed by the government, and sometimes termed as "Secular Marriage"  is nothing more, and nothing less than a civil union, period.
 


On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 3:14 PM, plainolamerican <plainolamerican@gmail.com> wrote:
nobody is asking the state to change the definition of marriage.
what's in question is equal rights for gays.
persecuting someone because of sexual preference seems quite archaic
and that's exactly what jewish/christian/muzzy religious doctrine
promotes.


On May 17, 12:25 pm, Keith In Tampa <keithinta...@gmail.com> wrote:
> But then there's those other 39 states which have either passed a
> Constitutional Amendment, or provided by statue the prohibition against
> modifying the definition of Marriage.
>
> On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 1:21 PM, plainolamerican
> <plainolameri...@gmail.com>wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> >http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/05/14/minnesota-gay-marriage-legal...
>
> > --
> > --
> > Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
> > For options & help seehttp://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
>
> > * Visit our other community athttp://www.PoliticalForum.com/
> > * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
> > * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
>
> > ---
> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> > "PoliticalForum" group.
> > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> > email to politicalforum+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
> > For more options, visithttps://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

--
--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "PoliticalForum" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to politicalforum+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.



--
--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
 
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "PoliticalForum" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to politicalforum+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
 
 

Re: Minnesota 12th State to Legalize Same-Sex Marriage

nobody is asking the state to change the definition of marriage.
what's in question is equal rights for gays.
persecuting someone because of sexual preference seems quite archaic
and that's exactly what jewish/christian/muzzy religious doctrine
promotes.


On May 17, 12:25 pm, Keith In Tampa <keithinta...@gmail.com> wrote:
> But then there's those other 39 states which have either passed a
> Constitutional Amendment, or provided by statue the prohibition against
> modifying the definition of Marriage.
>
> On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 1:21 PM, plainolamerican
> <plainolameri...@gmail.com>wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> >http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/05/14/minnesota-gay-marriage-legal...
>
> > --
> > --
> > Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
> > For options & help seehttp://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
>
> > * Visit our other community athttp://www.PoliticalForum.com/
> > * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
> > * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
>
> > ---
> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> > "PoliticalForum" group.
> > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> > email to politicalforum+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
> > For more options, visithttps://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

--
--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "PoliticalForum" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to politicalforum+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Re: Minnesota 12th State to Legalize Same-Sex Marriage

Geesh Plain Ol'?   When did you cross over to the Dark Side?
 
<Grin>!


On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 3:04 PM, plainolamerican <plainolamerican@gmail.com> wrote:
so much for states rights.

On May 17, 12:25 pm, Keith In Tampa <keithinta...@gmail.com> wrote:
> But then there's those other 39 states which have either passed a
> Constitutional Amendment, or provided by statue the prohibition against
> modifying the definition of Marriage.
>
> On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 1:21 PM, plainolamerican
> <plainolameri...@gmail.com>wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> >http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/05/14/minnesota-gay-marriage-legal...
>
> > --
> > --
> > Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
> > For options & help seehttp://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
>
> > * Visit our other community athttp://www.PoliticalForum.com/
> > * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
> > * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
>
> > ---
> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> > "PoliticalForum" group.
> > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> > email to politicalforum+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
> > For more options, visithttps://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

--
--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "PoliticalForum" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to politicalforum+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.



--
--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
 
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "PoliticalForum" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to politicalforum+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
 
 

Re: Minnesota 12th State to Legalize Same-Sex Marriage

so much for states rights.

On May 17, 12:25 pm, Keith In Tampa <keithinta...@gmail.com> wrote:
> But then there's those other 39 states which have either passed a
> Constitutional Amendment, or provided by statue the prohibition against
> modifying the definition of Marriage.
>
> On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 1:21 PM, plainolamerican
> <plainolameri...@gmail.com>wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> >http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/05/14/minnesota-gay-marriage-legal...
>
> > --
> > --
> > Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
> > For options & help seehttp://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
>
> > * Visit our other community athttp://www.PoliticalForum.com/
> > * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
> > * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
>
> > ---
> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> > "PoliticalForum" group.
> > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> > email to politicalforum+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
> > For more options, visithttps://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

--
--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "PoliticalForum" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to politicalforum+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Re: Minnesota 12th State to Legalize Same-Sex Marriage

But then there's those other 39 states which have either passed a Constitutional Amendment, or provided by statue the prohibition against modifying the definition of Marriage.


On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 1:21 PM, plainolamerican <plainolamerican@gmail.com> wrote:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/05/14/minnesota-gay-marriage-legal-_n_3275484.html

--
--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "PoliticalForum" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to politicalforum+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.



--
--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
 
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "PoliticalForum" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to politicalforum+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
 
 

Re: HUH? “Muslims to Tea Party, welcome to OUR world”

There is no common ground between American citizens who are
concerned with their government opening the floodgates
---
we know who promoted the opening of the flood gates and why.

aim small ... miss small.

On May 17, 12:17 pm, Travis <baconl...@gmail.com> wrote:
> **
>    BareNakedIslam posted: "Sorry Muslims, there is no moral equivalency
> between IRS scrutiny of Tea Party groups and Muslim terror-linked
> charities. There is no common ground between American citizens who are
> concerned with their government opening the floodgates to potential Musli"
>       New post on *BARE NAKED ISLAM*
> <http://www.barenakedislam.com/?author=1>  HUH? "Muslims to Tea Party,
> welcome to OUR world"<http://www.barenakedislam.com/2013/05/17/huh-muslims-to-tea-party-wel...>
> by
> BareNakedIslam <http://www.barenakedislam.com/?author=1>
>
> Sorry Muslims, there is no moral equivalency between IRS scrutiny of Tea
> Party groups and Muslim terror-linked charities. There is no common ground
> between American citizens who are concerned with their government opening
> the floodgates to potential Muslim terrorists and Muslim terrorists who are
> already here as well as those who support them with 'Zakat' […]
>
> Read more of this
> post<http://www.barenakedislam.com/2013/05/17/huh-muslims-to-tea-party-wel...>
>   *BareNakedIslam <http://www.barenakedislam.com/?author=1>* | May 17, 2013
> at 11:27 am | Categories: Say
> WHAT?<http://www.barenakedislam.com/?taxonomy=category&term=say-what>|
> URL:http://wp.me/p276zM-TF3
>
>  Comment<http://www.barenakedislam.com/2013/05/17/huh-muslims-to-tea-party-wel...>
>    See all comments<http://www.barenakedislam.com/2013/05/17/huh-muslims-to-tea-party-wel...>
>
>      Unsubscribe or change your email settings at Manage
> Subscriptions<https://subscribe.wordpress.com/?key=80d8873ee52adffe4e178d01c25562cf...>.
>
> *Trouble clicking?* Copy and paste this URL into your browser:http://www.barenakedislam.com/2013/05/17/huh-muslims-to-tea-party-wel...

--
--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "PoliticalForum" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to politicalforum+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Minnesota 12th State to Legalize Same-Sex Marriage

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/05/14/minnesota-gay-marriage-legal-_n_3275484.html

--
--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "PoliticalForum" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to politicalforum+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

World's longest truck





--
--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
 
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "PoliticalForum" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to politicalforum+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
 
 

HUH? “Muslims to Tea Party, welcome to OUR world”





BareNakedIslam posted: "Sorry Muslims, there is no moral equivalency between IRS scrutiny of Tea Party groups and Muslim terror-linked charities. There is no common ground between American citizens who are concerned with their government opening the floodgates to potential Musli"

New post on BARE NAKED ISLAM

HUH? "Muslims to Tea Party, welcome to OUR world"

by BareNakedIslam

Sorry Muslims, there is no moral equivalency between IRS scrutiny of Tea Party groups and Muslim terror-linked charities. There is no common ground between American citizens who are concerned with their government opening the floodgates to potential Muslim terrorists and Muslim terrorists who are already here as well as those who support them with 'Zakat' […]

Read more of this post

BareNakedIslam | May 17, 2013 at 11:27 am | Categories: Say WHAT? | URL: http://wp.me/p276zM-TF3

Comment    See all comments

Unsubscribe or change your email settings at Manage Subscriptions.

Trouble clicking? Copy and paste this URL into your browser:
http://www.barenakedislam.com/2013/05/17/huh-muslims-to-tea-party-welcome-to-our-world/




--
--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
 
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "PoliticalForum" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to politicalforum+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
 
 

Re: Ronald Regan's 31 YOLO moments.

I don't recall him actually saying he lied (I couldn't get audio on this either) ... here's an interesting read:

http://www.brown.edu/Research/Understanding_the_Iran_Contra_Affair/profile-reagan.php


On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 12:53 PM, plainolamerican <plainolamerican@gmail.com> wrote:
 nothing less than revisionist
history, smear, and probably far left extremist rhetoric and spin, if
not
flat out treason.
---
it's Raygun Ronnie admitting he lied about the Iran-Contra Affair.

On May 17, 9:46 am, Keith In Tampa <keithinta...@gmail.com> wrote:
> For some reason, the sound is not working on this You Tube clip for me.
> Just as well....I feel confident that this is nothing less than revisionist
> history, smear, and probably far left extremist rhetoric and spin, if not
> flat out treason.
>
> On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 10:37 AM, plainolamerican <plainolameri...@gmail.com
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > wrote:
> >http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eHXq8TRejow
>
> > On May 16, 10:13 am, Bear Bear <thatbear...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > I had to look it up.
>
> > > YOLO stands for You Only Live Once.
>
> > > Some good funny pics. A bit of a stroll down memory lane.
>
> > >http://www.buzzfeed.com/bennyjohnson/ronald-reagan-yolo
>
> > > Bear
>
> > --
> > --
> > Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
> > For options & help seehttp://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
>
> > * Visit our other community athttp://www.PoliticalForum.com/
> > * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
> > * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
>
> > ---
> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> > "PoliticalForum" group.
> > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> > email to politicalforum+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
> > For more options, visithttps://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

--
--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "PoliticalForum" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to politicalforum+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.





--
brine
http://brineb.blogspot.com/

--
--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
 
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "PoliticalForum" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to politicalforum+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
 
 

Feds to Students: You Can't Say That




http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424127887323582904578485041304763554.html

Greg Lukianoff: Feds to Students: You Can't Say That

By GREG LUKIANOFF

The scandals roiling Washington over the past two weeks involve troubling government behavior that had been hidden—the IRS targeting of conservative groups and the Justice Department's surveillance of the Associated Press, among others. Largely overlooked amid the histrionics has been a shocker hiding in plain sight. Last week, the Obama administration moved to dramatically undermine students' and faculty rights at colleges across the country.

The new policy was announced in a joint letter from the Education Department and Justice Department to the University of Montana. The May 9 letter addressed the results of a year-long joint investigation by the departments into the school's mishandling of several serious sexual-assault cases. The investigation determined that the university's policies addressing sexual assault failed to comply with Title IV of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972.

But the joint letter, which announced a "resolution agreement" with the university, didn't stop there. It then proceeded to rewrite the federal government's rules about sexual harassment and free speech on campus.

If that sounds hyperbolic, consider the letter itself. The first paragraph declares that the Montana findings should serve as a "blueprint for colleges and universities throughout the country." After outlining the specifics of the case, the letter states that only a stunningly broad definition of sexual harassment—"unwelcome conduct of a sexual nature"—will now satisfy federal statutory requirements. This explicitly includes "verbal conduct," otherwise known as speech.

Corbis

The letter rejects the requirement, established by legal precedent and previous Education Department guidance, that sexual harassment must be "objectively offensive." By eliminating this "reasonable person" standard—which the Education Department has required since at least 2003, and which protects the accused against unreasonable or insincere allegations—the right not to be offended has been enshrined in a federal mandate.

The letter further states that campuses have "an obligation to respond to student-on-student harassment" even when that harassment occurs off-campus. In some circumstances, the letter says, universities may take "disciplinary action against the harasser" even "prior to the completion of the Title IX and Title IV investigation/resolution." In plain English: Students can be punished before they are found guilty of harassment.

Given that the letter represents an interpretation of federal law by major federal agencies, most colleges will regard it as binding. Noncompliance threatens federal funding, including Pell grants and Stafford loans.

The implications for professors and students are enormous. An unsuccessful request for a date, or even assigning a potentially offensive book like "Lolita," could now be construed as harassment. As attorney and civil libertarian Wendy Kaminer commented on The Atlantic's website this week: "The stated goal of this policy is stemming discrimination, but the inevitable result will be advancing it, in the form of content-based prohibitions on speech."

This attack on campus free speech follows the Education Department's directive two years ago requiring every college in the country that receives federal funds to lower the standard of evidence in sexual-harassment cases. The "preponderance of the evidence," the judiciary's lowest standard of proof, became the required standard. (Many institutions had previously used the "clear and convincing" standard.) As former Dean of Harvard CollegeHarry Lewis has noted, the "preponderance of evidence" mandate means "more convictions—of both guilty and innocent individuals," which is a troubling result "in a society that values individual rights."

Last week's letter is part of a decades-long effort by anti-"hate speech" professors, students, activists and administrators to classify any offensive speech as harassment unprotected by the First Amendment. Such speech codes reached their height in the 1980s and 1990s, but they were defeated in federal and state court and came in for public ridicule.

Despite these setbacks, harassment-based speech codes have become the de facto rule. Earlier this year, my organization, the Foundation for Individual Rights in Education, published a study that looked at 409 colleges and found that 62% maintain codes that violate First Amendment standards.

The stifling effect of these codes isn't theoretical. In 2011, the University of Denver suspended a professor and found him guilty of sexual harassment because his class discussion on sexual taboos in American culture (in a graduate-level course) was considered too racy. Last year, Appalachian State University suspended a professor for creating a "hostile environment" after she criticized the university's treatment of sexual-assault cases involving student-athletes and screened a documentary critical of the adult-film industry.

Recent history gives no reason to expect that the government's new directive on "verbal conduct" will remain confined to sexual speech. At Tufts in 2007, a conservative student publication was found guilty of harassment for criticizing Islam. The same happened to a professor at Purdue University at Calumet in 2012, who faced a four-month investigation.

An obsession with political correctness and the expansion of bureaucracy on campus are key factors in the proliferation of such free-speech abuses. But the hidden force that pushes schools to overreact to offensive, or merely dissenting, speech is fear of liability and the federal government. A growing "risk-management" industry—complete with regular conferences, conventions and consultants—has arisen from efforts by university administrators trying to avoid being sued for discrimination or harassment, and to avoid the costly investigations in which the Education Department's Office for Civil Rights specializes.

All of this effort and expense ought to be unnecessary. The Supreme Court already did the work in Davis v. Monroe County Board of Education (1999). Recognizing that workplace standards for harassment were inappropriate for educational institutions, in Davis the court offered a clear, narrow, workable definition of harassment as a targeted pattern of serious and ongoing discriminatory behavior.

Adopting this standard would have solved—and would still solve, if implemented—universities' liability panic, while allowing real harassers to be punished and avoiding serious threats to freedom of speech. But the Education and Justice departments apparently don't want to embrace the Supreme Court's solution. In their letter, they explicitly reject (and misquote) the court's thoughtful analysis in Davis, deeming it inapplicable for the agencies' "purposes of administrative enforcement."

When the Education Department lowered the standard of evidence for harassment accusations in 2011, some college administrators complained, but most meekly accepted the federal mandate. They may be regretting that submission, now that the government is pushing for even lower standards. Unless we decide that college should primarily be a social institution devoted to preventing offense, it is time for universities—as well as state governments, alumni, students, parents, faculty and citizens—to fight back.

Mr. Lukianoff is the author of "Unlearning Liberty: Campus Censorship and the End of American Debate" (Encounter, 2012) and the president of the Foundation for Individual Rights in Education.

A version of this article appeared May 17, 2013, on page A15 in the U.S. edition of The Wall Street Journal, with the headline: Feds to Students: You Can't Say That.

 









--
--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
 
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "PoliticalForum" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to politicalforum+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
 
 

Re: Ronald Regan's 31 YOLO moments.

I assume you mean President Ronald Reagan, and President Reagan never admitted to lying.....President Reagan did not lie regarding the events surrounding the Iran and arms for the Contras. 
 
Just didn't happen Plain Ol'.  As much as you and your far left extremist friends continue to try and paint it that way.


On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 12:53 PM, plainolamerican <plainolamerican@gmail.com> wrote:
 nothing less than revisionist
history, smear, and probably far left extremist rhetoric and spin, if
not
flat out treason.
---
it's Raygun Ronnie admitting he lied about the Iran-Contra Affair.

On May 17, 9:46 am, Keith In Tampa <keithinta...@gmail.com> wrote:
> For some reason, the sound is not working on this You Tube clip for me.
> Just as well....I feel confident that this is nothing less than revisionist
> history, smear, and probably far left extremist rhetoric and spin, if not
> flat out treason.
>
> On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 10:37 AM, plainolamerican <plainolameri...@gmail.com
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > wrote:
> >http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eHXq8TRejow
>
> > On May 16, 10:13 am, Bear Bear <thatbear...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > I had to look it up.
>
> > > YOLO stands for You Only Live Once.
>
> > > Some good funny pics. A bit of a stroll down memory lane.
>
> > >http://www.buzzfeed.com/bennyjohnson/ronald-reagan-yolo
>
> > > Bear
>
> > --
> > --
> > Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
> > For options & help seehttp://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
>
> > * Visit our other community athttp://www.PoliticalForum.com/
> > * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
> > * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
>
> > ---
> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> > "PoliticalForum" group.
> > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> > email to politicalforum+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
> > For more options, visithttps://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

--
--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "PoliticalForum" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to politicalforum+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.



--
--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
 
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "PoliticalForum" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to politicalforum+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
 
 

Re: IRS Targeted Catholic League

Obviously,  the Catholic League is not tax exempt!


On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 1:06 PM, plainolamerican <plainolamerican@gmail.com> wrote:
IRS Targeted Catholic League
---
the tax-exempt status for religious groups must end.

On May 17, 10:59 am, Keith In Tampa <keithinta...@gmail.com> wrote:
> IRS Targeted Catholic
> League<http://americac2c.com/profiles/blogs/irs-targeted-catholic-league?xg_...>
>
> By Bill Donohue
>
> The problems with the IRS extend beyond playing politics with conservative
> groups seeking a tax-exempt status. I have never made this public before,
> but given the heightened interest in the way the IRS has conducted itself,
> the time has come to disclose what happened.
>
> Just weeks after Barack Obama was elected president in 2008, I was notified
> by the IRS that the Catholic League was under investigation for violating
> the IRS Code on political activities as it relates to 501(c)(3)
> organizations. What the IRS did not know was that I had proof who contacted
> them to launch the investigation: Catholics United, a George Soros-funded
> Catholic organization.
>
> The IRS was contacted on June 5, 2008, to launch a probe of the Catholic
> League, and the letter sent to me was dated Nov. 24, 2008. The June
> 5letter was sent to the IRS by lawyers from Catholics United; it was
> mailed
> to Director Marsha Ramirez, director of Exempt Organizations Examinations,
> and to Lois G. Lerner, director of EO Division.
>
> The "evidence" against me was nothing more than news releases and articles
> I had written during the presidential campaign on various issues. The
> lawyers also asked the IRS to question the source of new funding we had
> received, implying that we received illegal contributions.
>
> The timing is not coincidental. On Oct. 20, I issued a news release,
> "George Soros Funds Catholic Left," and on Oct. 23, I wrote another one,
> "Catholic Left Scandal Mounts"; both mentioned Catholics United. The same
> day, Oct. 23, I was asked to go on CNN, and when Catholics United found
> out, they contacted the station trying to spike the interview.
>
> The person who did this was the head of Catholics United, Chris Korzen. He
> said I was not "an authentic Catholic commentator and representative of the
> Catholic Church," and that they should either drop me altogether or put me
> on with Alexia Kelley of Catholics in Alliance for the Common Good
> (Catholics United is listed on the 990 of Catholics in Alliance as a
> related organization; Soros greases this group, and by extension, Catholics
> United).
>
> The bid to keep me off TV failed. But here's the key: Korzen was dumb
> enough to share with CNN the complaint issued by his group to the IRS. The
> document, which was leaked to me by someone at CNN, matches up
> extraordinarily well with the IRS complaint of Nov. 24.
>
> In the end, the IRS concluded that although the Catholic League had
> "intervened in a political campaign," it was "unintentional, isolated,
> non-egregious and non-recurring"; our tax-exempt status remained intact.
> This is false: I intentionally addressed political issues, and did not
> intervene in the campaign, unless, of course, my freedom to speak about
> political issues is a violation of the IRS Code. If that is the case, then
> this IRS unit should fold.
>
> So the problem extends beyond the IRS. It extends to left-wing activists,
> funded by left-wing tycoons, all for the purpose of silencing
> conservatives. It's time someone was held accountable for this obscene
> political game.

--
--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "PoliticalForum" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to politicalforum+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.



--
--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
 
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "PoliticalForum" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to politicalforum+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
 
 

Re: IRS Targeted Catholic League

IRS Targeted Catholic League
---
the tax-exempt status for religious groups must end.

On May 17, 10:59 am, Keith In Tampa <keithinta...@gmail.com> wrote:
> IRS Targeted Catholic
> League<http://americac2c.com/profiles/blogs/irs-targeted-catholic-league?xg_...>
>
> By Bill Donohue
>
> The problems with the IRS extend beyond playing politics with conservative
> groups seeking a tax-exempt status. I have never made this public before,
> but given the heightened interest in the way the IRS has conducted itself,
> the time has come to disclose what happened.
>
> Just weeks after Barack Obama was elected president in 2008, I was notified
> by the IRS that the Catholic League was under investigation for violating
> the IRS Code on political activities as it relates to 501(c)(3)
> organizations. What the IRS did not know was that I had proof who contacted
> them to launch the investigation: Catholics United, a George Soros-funded
> Catholic organization.
>
> The IRS was contacted on June 5, 2008, to launch a probe of the Catholic
> League, and the letter sent to me was dated Nov. 24, 2008. The June
> 5letter was sent to the IRS by lawyers from Catholics United; it was
> mailed
> to Director Marsha Ramirez, director of Exempt Organizations Examinations,
> and to Lois G. Lerner, director of EO Division.
>
> The "evidence" against me was nothing more than news releases and articles
> I had written during the presidential campaign on various issues. The
> lawyers also asked the IRS to question the source of new funding we had
> received, implying that we received illegal contributions.
>
> The timing is not coincidental. On Oct. 20, I issued a news release,
> "George Soros Funds Catholic Left," and on Oct. 23, I wrote another one,
> "Catholic Left Scandal Mounts"; both mentioned Catholics United. The same
> day, Oct. 23, I was asked to go on CNN, and when Catholics United found
> out, they contacted the station trying to spike the interview.
>
> The person who did this was the head of Catholics United, Chris Korzen. He
> said I was not "an authentic Catholic commentator and representative of the
> Catholic Church," and that they should either drop me altogether or put me
> on with Alexia Kelley of Catholics in Alliance for the Common Good
> (Catholics United is listed on the 990 of Catholics in Alliance as a
> related organization; Soros greases this group, and by extension, Catholics
> United).
>
> The bid to keep me off TV failed. But here's the key: Korzen was dumb
> enough to share with CNN the complaint issued by his group to the IRS. The
> document, which was leaked to me by someone at CNN, matches up
> extraordinarily well with the IRS complaint of Nov. 24.
>
> In the end, the IRS concluded that although the Catholic League had
> "intervened in a political campaign," it was "unintentional, isolated,
> non-egregious and non-recurring"; our tax-exempt status remained intact.
> This is false: I intentionally addressed political issues, and did not
> intervene in the campaign, unless, of course, my freedom to speak about
> political issues is a violation of the IRS Code. If that is the case, then
> this IRS unit should fold.
>
> So the problem extends beyond the IRS. It extends to left-wing activists,
> funded by left-wing tycoons, all for the purpose of silencing
> conservatives. It's time someone was held accountable for this obscene
> political game.

--
--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "PoliticalForum" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to politicalforum+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Re: Ronald Regan's 31 YOLO moments.

 nothing less than revisionist
history, smear, and probably far left extremist rhetoric and spin, if
not
flat out treason.
---
it's Raygun Ronnie admitting he lied about the Iran-Contra Affair.

On May 17, 9:46 am, Keith In Tampa <keithinta...@gmail.com> wrote:
> For some reason, the sound is not working on this You Tube clip for me.
> Just as well....I feel confident that this is nothing less than revisionist
> history, smear, and probably far left extremist rhetoric and spin, if not
> flat out treason.
>
> On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 10:37 AM, plainolamerican <plainolameri...@gmail.com
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > wrote:
> >http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eHXq8TRejow
>
> > On May 16, 10:13 am, Bear Bear <thatbear...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > I had to look it up.
>
> > > YOLO stands for You Only Live Once.
>
> > > Some good funny pics. A bit of a stroll down memory lane.
>
> > >http://www.buzzfeed.com/bennyjohnson/ronald-reagan-yolo
>
> > > Bear
>
> > --
> > --
> > Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
> > For options & help seehttp://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
>
> > * Visit our other community athttp://www.PoliticalForum.com/
> > * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
> > * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
>
> > ---
> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> > "PoliticalForum" group.
> > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> > email to politicalforum+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
> > For more options, visithttps://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

--
--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "PoliticalForum" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to politicalforum+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Re: Attorney: “Every single application of a Muslim nonprofit has flown through the IRS, with less scrutiny”

everyone is afraid of the muzieshits.
---
wrong ... only the xians and jews are afraid of the muzzies.

On May 17, 10:32 am, Travis <baconl...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Couldn't possibly be because everyone is afraid of the muzieshits.
>
> On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 9:52 AM, Keith In Tampa <keithinta...@gmail.com>wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > This is quite telling,  but of course folks like Plain Ol'  will chalk it
> > up to the Chinese folks from Ixia as being the cause and problem of this
> > conundrum.....
>
> > On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 10:33 AM, Travis <baconl...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >> **
> >>    creeping posted: "Including terror-linked CAIR (see links below). via
> >> ILLUME reporter, a corporate and tax attorney, Maryam Khan Ansari. Do
> >> Muslim Nonprofits Have it Easier Than Tea Party Groups? Has the Internal
> >> Revenue Service been tacitly cracking down on the Tea P"    Respond to
> >> this post by replying above this line
> >>       New post on *Creeping Sharia*
> >> <http://creepingsharia.wordpress.com/author/creeping/>  Attorney: "Every
> >> single application of a Muslim nonprofit has flown through the IRS, with
> >> less scrutiny"<http://creepingsharia.wordpress.com/2013/05/17/attorney-every-single-...> by
> >> creeping <http://creepingsharia.wordpress.com/author/creeping/>
>
> >> Including terror-linked CAIR (see links below). via ILLUME reporter, a
> >> corporate and tax attorney, Maryam Khan Ansari. Do Muslim Nonprofits Have
> >> it Easier Than Tea Party Groups? Has the Internal Revenue Service been
> >> tacitly cracking down on the Tea Party? Quite possibly, according to CNN,
> >> in what's being called "The IRS Tea-Party Scandal." In fact, […]
>
> >> Read more of this post<http://creepingsharia.wordpress.com/2013/05/17/attorney-every-single-...>
> >>   *creeping <http://creepingsharia.wordpress.com/author/creeping/>* |
> >> May 17, 2013 at 9:50 AM | Tags: Barack Obama<http://creepingsharia.wordpress.com/?tag=barack-obama>,
> >> cair <http://creepingsharia.wordpress.com/?tag=cair>, Creeping Sharia<http://creepingsharia.wordpress.com/?tag=creeping-sharia>,
> >> finance <http://creepingsharia.wordpress.com/?tag=finance>, hamas<http://creepingsharia.wordpress.com/?tag=hamas>,
> >> law <http://creepingsharia.wordpress.com/?tag=law>, Legal<http://creepingsharia.wordpress.com/?tag=legal>,
> >> Life <http://creepingsharia.wordpress.com/?tag=life>, Media<http://creepingsharia.wordpress.com/?tag=media>,
> >> Muslim <http://creepingsharia.wordpress.com/?tag=muslim>, News<http://creepingsharia.wordpress.com/?tag=news>,
> >> Obama <http://creepingsharia.wordpress.com/?tag=obama>, Random<http://creepingsharia.wordpress.com/?tag=random>,
> >> Religion <http://creepingsharia.wordpress.com/?tag=religion>, Sharia<http://creepingsharia.wordpress.com/?tag=sharia>| Categories:
> >> Alerts <http://creepingsharia.wordpress.com/?cat=10378>, Creeping Sharia<http://creepingsharia.wordpress.com/?cat=4115925>,
> >> DC <http://creepingsharia.wordpress.com/?cat=9092>, Legal<http://creepingsharia.wordpress.com/?cat=2283>,
> >> Media <http://creepingsharia.wordpress.com/?cat=292>, News<http://creepingsharia.wordpress.com/?cat=103>,
> >> Obama <http://creepingsharia.wordpress.com/?cat=376320>, Politics<http://creepingsharia.wordpress.com/?cat=398>,
> >> Religion <http://creepingsharia.wordpress.com/?cat=116>, Sharia<http://creepingsharia.wordpress.com/?cat=29069>,
> >> Stealth Jihad <http://creepingsharia.wordpress.com/?cat=10735225> | URL:
> >>http://wp.me/pbU4v-eEd
>
> >>  Comment<http://creepingsharia.wordpress.com/2013/05/17/attorney-every-single-...>
> >>    See all comments<http://creepingsharia.wordpress.com/2013/05/17/attorney-every-single-...>
>
> >>      Unsubscribe or change your email settings at Manage Subscriptions<https://subscribe.wordpress.com/?key=80d8873ee52adffe4e178d01c25562cf...>.
>
> >> *Trouble clicking?* Copy and paste this URL into your browser:
>
> >>http://creepingsharia.wordpress.com/2013/05/17/attorney-every-single-...
> >>          Thanks for flying with WordPress.com <http://wordpress.com>
>
> >>  --
> >> --
> >> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
> >> For options & help seehttp://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
>
> >> * Visit our other community athttp://www.PoliticalForum.com/
> >> * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
> >> * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
>
> >> ---
> >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> >> "PoliticalForum" group.
> >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> >> email to politicalforum+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
> >> For more options, visithttps://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>
> >  --
> > --
> > Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
> > For options & help seehttp://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
>
> > * Visit our other community athttp://www.PoliticalForum.com/
> > * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
> > * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
>
> > ---
> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> > "PoliticalForum" group.
> > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> > email to politicalforum+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
> > For more options, visithttps://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

--
--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "PoliticalForum" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to politicalforum+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.