Thursday, 23 May 2013

Stiff competition for Most Fatuous Reaction award





This is an article I have just posted on melaniephillips.com

Is this email not displaying correctly?
View it in your browser.

 

 


Stiff competition for Most Fatuous Reaction award


There's been some stiff competition over the past 24 hours for the coveted award of Most Fatuous Reaction to a Jihadi Atrocity.
 
I hooted at the commentator visiting from planet Zog, who had thus totally missed all the barbaric snuff-movie beheadings and eviscerations and human bomb attacks carried out by jihadists over the past two decades across the world and who wailed, poor dear, that 'none of it made any sense'.
 
I enjoyed the pointed satire of the commentator who intoned that we were all guilty of causing the two jihadis to hack poor Drummer Rigby to death and tried to behead him, while claiming they were fulfilling the edicts of the Koran and waiting for the police to arrive in order to try to murder them too – but then I realised that it wasn't satire at all.
 
I marvelled at the languidly superior commentator who drawled that the problem in Woolwich had been caused by 'testosterone' and that the real threat to all of us was actually from the collapsing EDL and the all-but collapsed BNP.  And at the even more languidly superior commentator, who flicked barbs at Britain's 'hyperbole' and 'hysteria' and implied that in Woolwich Britain kind of had it coming to it since it had been perceived as indifferent to 'the appalling impact of a drone attack on a Pashtun village'.
 
Nice.
 
But worthy contenders as all these are for this prestigious award, I have decided that two further notable contributions tie in equal first place. In a statement described by the Spectator as 'sensitive and calm' the Prime Minister, David Cameron,
told the nation
that the Woolwich attack 'was also a betrayal of Islam' ,' there is nothing in Islam that justifies this truly dreadful act' and the fault lay 'solely and purely with the sickening individuals who carried out this appalling attack'.
 

In similar vein the Mayor of London, Boris Johnson, said:
 
'It is completely wrong to blame this killing on the religion of Islam but it is also equally wrong to try to draw any link between this murder and British foreign policy or the actions of British forces who are risking their lives abroad for the sake of freedom. The fault lies wholly and exclusively in the warped and deluded mindset of the people who did it.'
 
So to the Prime Minister and the Mayor, there was nothing to connect the Woolwich atrocity to Islam at all.  But on his little video rant, one of the killers drew explicitly on the Koran as the inspiration for his attack:
 
'Surat at-Tawba through...many, many ayat throughout the Qur'an that...we must fight them as they fight us...'
 

which refers to a number of exhortations to 'fight the unbelievers and 'kill the polythesists wherever you find them' and other such stuff in similar vein.
 
Nothing to do with Islam? It's as absurd as saying the Inquisition had nothing to do with the Catholic Church, or the Holocaust had nothing to do with Nazism but these things were just the product of a few warped and deluded individuals.  
 
If indeed such terrorism is noting to do with Islam, why is it justified by the Islamic high establishment? As the liberal Egyptian thinker Tarek Heggy
wrote last year:

 'The cornerstone of the theory, which is the essence of Islamic thinking, is that humans must not set the rules governing relations between people, but that these can only be set by the Almighty. To this day, not a single leader of any movement of political Islam has reconsidered the idea of hakemeya [the Islamist view of man-made laws] introduced by Sayed Qutb in his famous treatise, "Signposts Along the Road" … Thus the Islamist has a constant problem with man-made constitutional and legal rules.…
 
'Certainly the leaderships of most schools of political Islam refuse to describe the suicide attacks launched by Muslim fanatics against civilians as terrorist attacks. Certainly too none of them consider Osama bin Laden a terrorist. Indeed, most hold him in high regard…'

 
What's bizarre is that jihadis are treated as genuine Muslim spokesmen -- see the way broadcasters were giving one of them air-time yesterday -- but when it comes to analysing an Islamic terror attack, that very same political and media establishment falls over itself to agree with those extremists that its perpetrators are not real Muslims at all.
 
Even more absurd, these craven politicians are now being left behind by Muslims themselves. In the Guardian, for example, Usama Hasan
has written:
 
'British society, including its Muslim communities, needs to move beyond the routine condemnation of terrorist attacks and plots – there have been dozens since 9/11. We need instead to address the extreme Islamist ideology that al-Qaida and its sympathisers promote to incite attacks against soldiers and civilians worldwide in both war-torn and peaceful countries. Muslim leaders need to take ownership of the specifically religious aspects of the problem, that is to say the twisted theology that easily brainwashes vulnerable people, some of whom are intelligent university students and graduates.'
 

Maybe Usama Hasan could have a quiet word with the Prime Minister and Mayor of London.










--
--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
 
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "PoliticalForum" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to politicalforum+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
 
 

Progressives In Britain Invited Beheading





burkasrugly posted: "Fellow infidels, Michelle Malkin is absolutely correct about the PC progressive culture in England being responsible for the young British officer being beheaded in broad daylight yesterday.  Is this the same country that gave the world Winston Churchi"
Respond to this post by replying above this line

New post on actjonesboroar

Progressives In Britain Invited Beheading

by burkasrugly

Fellow infidels,

Michelle Malkin is absolutely correct about the PC progressive culture in England being responsible for the young British officer being beheaded in broad daylight yesterday.  Is this the same country that gave the world Winston Churchill???? Yes, they have brought the Muslim menace upon themselves, and it may be too late to stop England-once the center of Western Civilization-from becoming an Islamic state.  As a matter of fact, it is becoming more and more plausible every day, which is a sad commentary.  But on the other hand, there are many people there who do not want this to happen and try to stop it.   There should be millions of people who have the spunk that Michelle Malkin has.  If they did, then Western Civilization might have a chance to survive.  Watch the clip of Michelle Malking debating a brain-dead liberal, Leslie Marshall about the savage Muslim attack:

Is it just me, or does Leslie always look like she just got finished sucking on a lemon?

Until next time,

Burkasrugly

Comment    See all comments

Unsubscribe or change your email settings at Manage Subscriptions.

Trouble clicking? Copy and paste this URL into your browser:
http://actjonesboroar.wordpress.com/2013/05/23/progressives-in-britain-invited-beheading/

Thanks for flying with WordPress.com



--
--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
 
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "PoliticalForum" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to politicalforum+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
 
 

Re: DOCUMENTARY: This Is What Winning Looks Like

Can you show me Kurdistan prior to 1953,  or prior to WWI on a map Brine?

 

 

 

 

 



On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 6:37 PM, Brian Bednarek <brineb@gmail.com> wrote:
Let's start with the lines drawn in the sand by Churchill post WWI ... all those countries from the old Ottoman Empire were created based on economic interests, not local ethnic/religious regions ... just ask the Kurds why after almost 100 years they STILL have no Kurdistan and are randomly in three countries ... from that point just follow history and you will understand why the folk in the middle east hate the west ... it's STILL about what happened after WWI ... kinda how the end of WWI allowed a situation where the Nazis were allowed to come into power!!!


On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 5:40 PM, Keith In Tampa <keithintampa@gmail.com> wrote:
Plain Ol', maybe you can point to specific examples of what you believe is the U.S. or the U.K.  "intervening"  in the Middle East or South West Asia?   I would like for you to provide examples.

 

 


On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 5:27 PM, plainolamerican <plainolamerican@gmail.com> wrote:
DOCUMENTARY: This Is What Winning Looks Like
---
there's no winning with intervention in the middle east.

On May 23, 10:43 am, Travis <baconl...@gmail.com> wrote:
> **
>    Sard posted: ""This Is What Winning Looks Like" is a disturbing new
> documentary about the ineptitude, drug abuse, sexual misconduct, and
> corruption of the Afghan security forces as well as the reduced role of US
> Marines due to the troop withdrawal. In part one, we see "
>       New post on *therightplanet.com*
> <http://www.therightplanet.com/?author=2>  DOCUMENTARY: This Is What
> Winning Looks Like<http://www.therightplanet.com/2013/05/documentary-this-is-what-winnin...>
> by
> Sard <http://www.therightplanet.com/?author=2>
>
> "This Is What Winning Looks Like" is a disturbing new documentary about the
> ineptitude, drug abuse, sexual misconduct, and corruption of the Afghan
> security forces as well as the reduced role of US Marines due to the troop
> withdrawal. In part one, we see just how chaotic and hopeless the situation
> is in Sangin, one […]
>
> Read more of this
> post<http://www.therightplanet.com/2013/05/documentary-this-is-what-winnin...>
>   *Sard <http://www.therightplanet.com/?author=2>* | May 22, 2013 at 11:23
> pm | Tags: Afghan National
> Army<http://www.therightplanet.com/?taxonomy=post_tag&term=afghan-national...>,
> ANA <http://www.therightplanet.com/?taxonomy=post_tag&term=ana>, Sangin
> Province<http://www.therightplanet.com/?taxonomy=post_tag&term=sangin-province>,
> USMC <http://www.therightplanet.com/?taxonomy=post_tag&term=usmc> |
> Categories: Afghanistan<http://www.therightplanet.com/?taxonomy=category&term=afghanistan>,
> American Culture<http://www.therightplanet.com/?taxonomy=category&term=american-culture>,
> American Sovereignty<http://www.therightplanet.com/?taxonomy=category&term=american-sovere...>,
> Communications<http://www.therightplanet.com/?taxonomy=category&term=communications>,
> Conservatism<http://www.therightplanet.com/?taxonomy=category&term=conservatism>,
> Foreign Policy<http://www.therightplanet.com/?taxonomy=category&term=foreign-policy>,
> GOP <http://www.therightplanet.com/?taxonomy=category&term=gop>,
> History<http://www.therightplanet.com/?taxonomy=category&term=history>,
> House of Representatives<http://www.therightplanet.com/?taxonomy=category&term=house-of-repres...>,
> Islam <http://www.therightplanet.com/?taxonomy=category&term=islam>,
> Legal/Judicial<http://www.therightplanet.com/?taxonomy=category&term=legaljudicial>,
> Main-Stream Media<http://www.therightplanet.com/?taxonomy=category&term=main-stream-media>,
> National Defense<http://www.therightplanet.com/?taxonomy=category&term=national-defense>,
> National Security<http://www.therightplanet.com/?taxonomy=category&term=national-security>,
> Sacrifice <http://www.therightplanet.com/?taxonomy=category&term=sacrifice>,
> Senate <http://www.therightplanet.com/?taxonomy=category&term=senate>, Social
> Engineering<http://www.therightplanet.com/?taxonomy=category&term=social-engineering>,
> Terrorism <http://www.therightplanet.com/?taxonomy=category&term=terrorism>,
> Theocracy <http://www.therightplanet.com/?taxonomy=category&term=theocracy>,
> Totalitarianism<http://www.therightplanet.com/?taxonomy=category&term=totalitarianism>,
> Tyranny <http://www.therightplanet.com/?taxonomy=category&term=tyranny>, U.S.
> Constitution<http://www.therightplanet.com/?taxonomy=category&term=u-s-constitution>,
> U.S. Military<http://www.therightplanet.com/?taxonomy=category&term=u-s-military>,
> War <http://www.therightplanet.com/?taxonomy=category&term=war> | URL:http://wp.me/p1SHGG-a1m
>
>  Comment<http://www.therightplanet.com/2013/05/documentary-this-is-what-winnin...>
>    See all comments<http://www.therightplanet.com/2013/05/documentary-this-is-what-winnin...>
>
>      Unsubscribe or change your email settings at Manage
> Subscriptions<https://subscribe.wordpress.com/?key=80d8873ee52adffe4e178d01c25562cf...>.
>
> *Trouble clicking?* Copy and paste this URL into your browser:http://www.therightplanet.com/2013/05/documentary-this-is-what-winnin...

--
--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "PoliticalForum" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to politicalforum+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.



--
--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
 
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "PoliticalForum" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to politicalforum+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
 
 



--
brine
http://brineb.blogspot.com/

--
--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
 
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "PoliticalForum" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to politicalforum+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
 
 

--
--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
 
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "PoliticalForum" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to politicalforum+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
 
 

Profile of a Flawed Post-American President






Profile of a Post-American President

Prof. Paul Eidelberg

Barack Hussein Obama's flawed character was known before he was elected President of the United States.

First and foremost was Obama's lack of identity. This is a man devoid of national consciousness.  I am referring not to his questionable citizenship but to the abysmal ignorance he displayed early on regarding America's foundational documents, the Declaration of Independence and the United States Constitution. Obama is in truth a man without a country.

Second, and consistent with the preceding, Obama publically rejected the idea of American Exceptionalism, a rejection rooted in his multicultural moral relativism. Even before the 2008 election, he called himself a "cosmopolitan."    

Third, consider Obama's adulation of Islam, America's mortal enemy. This was evident even before he bowed to Saudi King Abdullah, a gesture that manifest his contempt for America and the office conferred upon him by the benighted American people.

Fourth, it was obvious early on that Obama is a socialist committed to a redistribution of wealth. But this means he is a Leftwing Statist who denies the primacy of individual freedom, the wellspring of creativity.

Fifth, it was also obvious that Obama lacked even a modicum of knowledge concerning foreign affairs. He came into the White House abysmally ignorant of history in general and of American history in particular.

Sixth, given his ignorance of the past, Obama was bound to adopt a policy of Change—meaning Regime Change. This policy required him to arouse resentment against the well-established ideas and institutions of the United States. Regime change required him to arouse egalitarian envy and to plant the seeds of class conflict.

Seventh, since Obama was psychologically out of tune with Americanism, the only way he could conduct himself in what amounted to a hostile cultural environment was to engage in dissembling and prevarication, or what Islam calls taqiyya. We see this manifested in his administration's avoidance of the term "terrorism" vis-à-vis Muslims. Recall what happened on November 5, 2009 at Fort Hood, Texas, when Nidal Malik Hasan, a 39-year-old Muslim serving as a U.S. Army major, shot and killed 13 people and wounded over 30 more.  The Obama Administration characterized this act of Islamic terrorism as "workplace violence"—to obscure an act motivated by the murderous teachings of what Mr. Obama calls the "holy Quran."

This mendacity is the condicio sine qua non of Mr. Obama and his administration.  It cannot be otherwise with a post-American president.◙










--
--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
 
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "PoliticalForum" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to politicalforum+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
 
 

10 Ways to Know that Black America Has Lost Its Mind Under Obama







10 Ways to Know that Black America Has Lost Its Mind Under Obama

The Your Black World team had a meeting and decided upon a few ways that we could tell that black America has lost it's mind under President Obama. We don't know which way is up or down, and it seems that good politics has been thrown out the window. So, here's a list of ways that we know that black people have lost their minds over the last five years. No, the list is not meant to be funny:

1) If gay people, immigrants and women have an agenda, it's considered good politics. When black people form an agenda, it's considered to be an attack on the president.

2) When every black commentator on MSNBC and TheGrio always supports every policy put out by the Obama Administration. We expect that, pretty soon, they'll all grow perms like Al Sharpton.

3) When anyone who questions the Obama Administration policies is called a hater, even if they voted for him.

4) When people just think that 14% black unemployment is business as usual, but 7% white unemployment is a crisis.

5) When Bush does something, it's horrible, racist and criminal. But when Obama does the same thing, it's considered good leadership

6) When people decided that "shut up and don't bother the president" became a good political strategy

7) When a Republican says something racist, we go on the attack. When a Democrat says something racist, it's all good.

8) When we give a politician 95% of the black vote and still think that we don't have a right to ask for anything.

9) When black leaders and civil rights groups are more excited about fighting for gay marriage than they are for racial equality.

10) When a president can tell a group of black men at Morehouse that "nobody cares if you were discriminated against," but then says that he does care when a woman says she was s-xually assaulted or a gay man says that he was bullied.

Don't get mad at us for telling the truth. You know that what we're saying is right.

 









--
--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
 
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "PoliticalForum" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to politicalforum+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
 
 

The Fourth Scandal: Kathleen Sebelius Shakedown of Health Care Companies







http://www.rightsidenews.com/2013052332584/life-and-science/health-and-education/the-fourth-scandal-kathleen-sebelius-shakedown-of-health-care-companies.html

 

The Fourth Scandal: Kathleen Sebelius Shakedown of Health Care Companies

Published on Thursday, 23 May 2013 12:21

Written by Greg Scandlen

While most of the media are fixated on Benghazi, the IRS abuses, and the DOJ’s interest in reporters’ phone calls, the biggest scandal of all may be Kathleen Sebelius’ shakedown of health care companies to pay for activities Congress has refused to fund.

It is illegal for government officials to solicit money from companies they regulate, according to Sarah Kliff from The Washington Post. She writes –

Federal regulations do not allow department officials to fundraise in their professional capacity. They do, however, allow Cabinet members to solicit donations as private citizens “if you do not solicit funds from a subordinate or from someone who has or seeks business with the Department, and you do not use your official title,” according to Justice Department regulations.

That should be a no-brainer. But Ms. Sebelius has violated the law before. Michael Cannon of the Cato Institute reminds us that in 2012 –

…the U.S. Office of Special Counsel concluded that Sebelius violated the Hatch Act by campaigning for President Obama and other political candidates while traveling on official business, an offense for which other federal workers are fired.

Ms. Sebelius apparently suffered no penalty for this transgression. Instead she continued to exercise unprecedented power in handing out waivers for unions and select others to avoid the requirements of ObamaCare, with absolutely no standards or guidance. Obeying the health reform law is mandatory, unless she decides it isn’t.

Industry shakedowns are nothing new for this administration. Before Mr. Obama was elected in 2008, you may remember that the pharmaceutical industry was the Democrats’ favorite whipping boy. Hardly a week went by without one of them demanding price controls or “re-importing” drugs from Canada. The industry was constantly accused of killing sick people by overcharging for medications, and profiteering from government-funded research. PhRMA was terrified of what the new administration was planning.

But in one of the most amazing turnabouts ever in Washington, PhRMA went from full-throated opposition to ObamaCare to full-throated support ― in just a matter of months.

On November 14, 2008, just a week after the election, The Washington Times reported that, “The nation’s largest pharmaceutical lobbying group is preparing a multimillion-dollar public relations campaign to tout the importance of free-market health care and undercut an expected push by the Obama administration for price controls of prescription drugs.” The article went on, “The stakes are especially high for drug makers, which stand to lose as much as $30 billion in revenue if President-elect Barack Obama‘s plan to let the federal government negotiate Medicare drug prices is implemented.”

Just nine months later, in August 2009, the publication Medical Marketing & Media was reporting just the opposite ― “PhRMA will launch a big advertising push for healthcare reform later this week, with T.V. spots airing in key states and on cable channels nationally.” The story continues, “News outlets including The New York Times and the Associated Press put spending on the ads in the range of $150 million ― a figure that PhRMA SVP Ken Johnson called speculative.”

What happened? The story quotes PhRMA president Bill Tauzin, “We were assured (by the White House): ‘We need somebody to come in first. If you come in first, you will have a rock-solid deal.’”

Apparently, PhRMA agreed to $80 billion in cuts aimed at filling the Medicare drug program’s “donut hole” and to spend $150 million in advertising to support Obama in exchange for a pledge that the White House would oppose price controls and re-importing drugs. And we haven’t heard a word of criticism of the pharmaceutical industry since then.

This time around it is the insurance industry that is being asked for favors ― to donate to Secretary Sibelius’ favorite “charity.” This is the very industry she directly or indirectly regulates.

The Ways and Means Committee is pretty concerned about this latest scam. It wrote a letter to the secretary which reminds her of the federal Anti-Deficiency Act, which reads in part –

From 5 CFR 2635.101 ― Basic obligation of public service.

(4) An employee shall not, except as permitted by subpart B of this part, solicit or accept any gift or other item of monetary value from any person or entity seeking official action from, doing business with, or conducting activities regulated by the employee’s agency, or whose interests may be substantially affected by the performance or nonperformance of the employee’s duties.

(14) Employees shall endeavor to avoid any actions creating the appearance that they are violating the law of the ethical standards set forth in this part. Whether particular circumstances create an appearance that the law or these standards have been violated shall be determined from the perspective of a reasonable person with knowledge of the relevant facts.

The letter goes on to demand answers to a series of questions about who exactly was solicited, by whom, and for what.

Looks bad for the secretary. Can she issue herself a waiver?

SOURCE: NCPA

Greg Scandlen is the founder of Consumers for Health Care Choices, a non-partisan, non-profit membership organization aimed at empowering consumers in the health care system. A former NCPA staff member, Scandlen is an accomplished writer, researcher, and public speaker. He is considered one of the nation's experts on health care financing, insurance regulation and employee benefits. He testifies frequently before Congress, and appears on such television shows as the O'Reilly Factor, NBC Nightly News, and CNN.

Scandlen has published numerous papers on topics such as health care costs, insurance reform, employee benefits, individual insurance programs, HSAs and HRAs, and every aspect of consumer-driven health care.

He also has served as a fellow in health policy at the Cato Institute and as President of the Health Benefits Group, a consulting firm in Frederick, Maryland

 









--
--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
 
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "PoliticalForum" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to politicalforum+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
 
 

News Organizations' Ties to White House






 










--
--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
 
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "PoliticalForum" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to politicalforum+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
 
 

Re: 'Muslims with Meat Cleavers and Knives and Me without a Gun'

Anyone that might come in contact with a muzzie should be well armed.

On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 5:18 PM, Brian Bednarek <brineb@gmail.com> wrote:
Perhaps everybody needs to carry butcher's knives and machettes as part of their daily lives, more so if you are military and seen as part of the problem to whackos!!!


On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 4:31 PM, Travis <baconlard@gmail.com> wrote:




'Muslims with Meat Cleavers and Knives and Me without a Gun'

Posted 5 hours ago by Gary DeMar filed under Crime, Culture, Immigration, Islam, Law, Liberalism, Politics, Second Amendment, Terrorism

If there was ever a reason to stop gun control, we now have a perfect example. In broad daylight, a self-identified Muslim shouting 'Allah Akbar' and an accomplice repeatedly stabbed and tried to behead an off-duty soldier in front of dozens of passers-by. What could they do? They were unarmed. Someone with a gun could have shot the men at a safe distance.

The gun v. sword scene in Raiders of the Lost Ark comes to mind.

Weapons are not the problem. If people want to murder, they'll find a way. If a gun isn't available, a couple of meat cleavers and knives will do the job.

I was talking with my company's cinematographer about sweeping landscape shots, and I mentioned the masterfully shot film Shane (1953) that stars Alan Ladd (Shane), Van Heflin (Joe Starret), Jean Arthur (Marian Starrett), and Jack Palance (Wilson).

There's a scene in Shane where Shane and Marian have a short discussion about guns:

Marian: "Guns aren't going to be my boy's life."

Shane: "A gun is a tool, Marian, no better or worse than any other tool. . . . An axe, a shovel, or anything. A gun is as good or bad as the man using it."

The exchange begins at the 1:37 mark. Watch the entire 2-minute clip. And if you haven't seen the film, you need to in the widescreen version.

As we learn, a gun was necessary for defense against a hired gunman (Palance), otherwise the settlers would have been driven off their land.

Great Britain has strict gun control laws. Advocates of gun control believe that these laws cut down on violence and crime. Such laws only empower lawbreakers.

The 2011 riots in London indicate that lawless people will use any means at their disposal to force their wills on others. Three men were killed by an automobile, people were openly beaten in the streets, and business establishments were looted while others were burned. Store owners had no way of protecting their property. The people doing the looting knew that they would meet little resistance. "In reality, the English approach has not reduced violent crime. Instead it has left law-abiding citizens at the mercy of criminals who are confident that their victims have neither the means nor the legal right to resist them. Imitating this model would be a public safety disaster for the United States."

So what does the law abiding citizen do? He shops on Amazon.com for baseball bats! He can't buy guns, so he gets the next best thing, a metal version of the Louisville Slugger. In a 24-hour period, sales for baseball bats on Amazon UK rose by more than 6000 percent.

Defenseless citizens were also buying police-style telescoping truncheons. (The spring-loaded ones are illegal.) The Guardian reported the following: "Amazon has removed several police-style telescopic truncheons from sale on its site as soaring sales of truncheons, baseball bats and other items that could be used as weapons sparked fears of vigilantism in the wake of widespread rioting."

So now, law-abiding citizens are even more defenseless. They can't even order a baseball bat on line to protect themselves from roaming thugs. Maybe it's time they whittle down their cricket bats. Paul Joseph Watson writes: "Just like gun control, banning baseball bats only disarms the public and creates victims. Criminals will always be able to acquire weapons of any description because they do not obey laws. Leaving Brits defenseless will only embolden the rioting hordes."



Read more: http://politicaloutcast.com/2013/05/muslims-with-meat-cleavers-and-knives-and-me-without-a-gun/#ixzz2U8g5d7y6









--
--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
 
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "PoliticalForum" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to politicalforum+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
 
 



--
brine
http://brineb.blogspot.com/

--
--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
 
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "PoliticalForum" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to politicalforum+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
 
 

--
--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
 
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "PoliticalForum" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to politicalforum+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
 
 

Re: Jesus vs the Paedophile Prophet Mohammed

I prefer to call it a cult of hate and death.  It is a total mind and body control system and muslims are just muslims and nothing else.

On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 4:37 PM, Keith In Tampa <keithintampa@gmail.com> wrote:
At least in Western Society,  the term "Islam" should be removed as a religious theocracy, and instead labeled as a political movement.  That would resolve most of the conflict I think.

On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 5:25 PM, plainolamerican <plainolamerican@gmail.com> wrote:
you seem to take the position that they are
entitled to be outraged because of Anglo-American influence in their
theocracies.
---
not so much entitled as understood.

On May 23, 9:13 am, Keith In Tampa <keithinta...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Good Morning Plain Ol'!
>
> I'm not real sure what you are referencing,  but you've been a master the
> last couple of days,  shifting gears and changing perspectives, especially
> with regard to "myth believers" and the damage that Muslims are
> causing......This morning, you seem to take the position that they are
> entitled to be outraged because of Anglo-American influence in their
> theocracies.
>
> Horse Hockey.   But masterful attempt at shifting positions!
>
> On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 6:13 AM, plainolamerican
> <plainolameri...@gmail.com>wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > living in FL, I'm sure you're used to it.
>
> > On May 22, 7:16 pm, Keith In Tampa <keithinta...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > You amaze me Plain Ol'.   A good job of talking out of both sides of your
> > > mouth today too!
>
> > > On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 6:47 PM, plainolamerican
> > > <plainolameri...@gmail.com>wrote:
>
> > > > civilian casualties in the streets of London are acceptable
> > > > to you?
> > > > ---
> > > > not an American concern.
>
> > > > We know who has been at the forefront in supporting movements aimed at
> > > > altering the ethnic status quo in the United States and England in
> > > > favor of immigration of non-European peoples.
> > > > Now they're whining like babies about the muzzies.
>
> > > > On May 22, 3:12 pm, Keith In Tampa <keithinta...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > Oh Really?  So civilian casualties in the streets of London are
> > > > acceptable
> > > > > to you?
>
> > > > > On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 4:07 PM, plainolamerican
> > > > > <plainolameri...@gmail.com>wrote:
>
> > > > > > don't complain about the way your enemy fights.
>
> > > > > > On May 22, 3:00 pm, Keith In Tampa <keithinta...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > Plain Ol', the "Misguided One" wrote:
>
> > > > > > > *"[t]ypical religious myth believer fear tactics. they don't
> > work on
> > > > the
> > > > > > > logical."*
>
> >http://www.americanthinker.com/video/2013/05/shock_london_soldier_att.
> > > > ..
>
> > > > > > > On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 1:35 PM, plainolamerican
> > > > > > > <plainolameri...@gmail.com>wrote:
>
> > > > > > > >  until they start coming for you and your family, wanting to
> > > > > > > > behead you and yours for blasphemy
> > > > > > > > ---
> > > > > > > > typical religious myth believer fear tactics.
> > > > > > > > they don't work on the logical.
>
> > > > > > > > On May 22, 11:35 am, Keith In Tampa <keithinta...@gmail.com>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > Plain Ol' wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > > *"watching religious myth believers persecute each other is
> > > > fun!!!"
> > > > > > > > > *
> > > > > > > > > Yea Plain Ol', until they start coming for you and your
> > family,
> > > > > > wanting
> > > > > > > > to
> > > > > > > > > behead you and yours for blasphemy.......Don't think it
> > cannot
> > > > > > happen to
> > > > > > > > > you!
>
> > > > > > > > > On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 12:32 PM, plainolamerican <
> > > > > > > > plainolameri...@gmail.com
>
> > > > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > Jesus vs the Paedophile Prophet Mohammed
> > > > > > > > > > ---
> > > > > > > > > > watching religious myth believers persecute each other is
> > > > fun!!!
>
> > > > > > > > > > On May 22, 7:13 am, Travis <baconl...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > **
> > > > > > > > > > >    BareNakedIslam posted: "Comedian Steven Crowder mocks
> > > > Islam.
> > > > > > Save
> > > > > > > > your
> > > > > > > > > > > death threats, muzzies, they won't be posted here.
> > > > > > > > > >http://youtu.be/RwluC6GoKLE"
> > > > > > > > > > >       New post on *BARE NAKED ISLAM*
> > > > > > > > > > > <http://www.barenakedislam.com/?author=1>  Jesus vs the
> > > > > > Paedophile
> > > > > > > > > > > Prophet Mohammed<
>
> >http://www.barenakedislam.com/2013/05/21/jesus-vs-the-paedophile-prop..
> > > > > > > > .>
> > > > > > > > > > > by
> > > > > > > > > > > BareNakedIslam <http://www.barenakedislam.com/?author=1>
>
> > > > > > > > > > > Comedian Steven Crowder mocks Islam. Save your death
> > threats,
> > > > > > > > muzzies,
> > > > > > > > > > they
> > > > > > > > > > > won't be posted here.
>
> > > > > > > > > > > Read more of this
> > > > > > > > > > > post<
>
> >http://www.barenakedislam.com/2013/05/21/jesus-vs-the-paedophile-prop..
> > > > > > > > .>
> > > > > > > > > > >   *BareNakedIslam <
> >http://www.barenakedislam.com/?author=1>*
> > > > |
> > > > > > May
> > > > > > > > 21,
> > > > > > > > > > 2013
> > > > > > > > > > > at 10:30 pm | Categories: Laughing at
> > > > > > > > > > > Islam<
>
> >http://www.barenakedislam.com/?taxonomy=category&term=laughing-at-islam
> > > > > > > > >|
> > > > > > > > > > > URL:http://wp.me/p276zM-TNd
>
> > > > > > > > > > >  Comment<
>
> >http://www.barenakedislam.com/2013/05/21/jesus-vs-the-paedophile-prop..
> > > > > > > > .>
> > > > > > > > > > >    See all comments<
>
> >http://www.barenakedislam.com/2013/05/21/jesus-vs-the-paedophile-prop..
> > > > > > > > .>
>
> > > > > > > > > > >      Unsubscribe or change your email settings at Manage
> > > > > > > > > > > Subscriptions<
>
> >https://subscribe.wordpress.com/?key=80d8873ee52adffe4e178d01c25562cf..
> > > > > > > > .>.
>
> > > > > > > > > > > *Trouble clicking?* Copy and paste this URL into your
> > > > browser:
>
> >http://www.barenakedislam.com/2013/05/21/jesus-vs-the-paedophile-prop.
> > > > > > > > ..
>
> > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
> > > > > > > > > > For options & help seehttp://
> > > > > > groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
>
> > > > > > > > > > * Visit our other community athttp://
> >www.PoliticalForum.com/
> > > > > > > > > > * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our
> > polls.
> > > > > > > > > > * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
>
> > > > > > > > > > ---
> > > > > > > > > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the
> > > > Google
> > > > > > > > Groups
> > > > > > > > > > "PoliticalForum" group.
> > > > > > > > > > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails
> > from
> > > > it,
> > > > > > send
> > > > > > > > an
> > > > > > > > > > email to politicalforum+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
> > > > > > > > > > For more options, visithttps://
> > > > groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>
> > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
> > > > > > > > For options & help seehttp://
> > > > groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
>
> > > > > > > > * Visit our other community athttp://www.PoliticalForum.com/
> > > > > > > > * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
> > > > > > > > * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
>
> > > > > > > > ---
> > > > > > > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the
> > Google
> > > > > > Groups
> > > > > > > > "PoliticalForum" group.
> > > > > > > > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from
> > it,
> > > > send
> > > > > > an
> > > > > > > > email to politicalforum+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
> > > > > > > > For more options, visithttps://
> > groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>
> > > > > > --
> > > > > > --
> > > > > > Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
> > > > > > For options & help seehttp://
> > groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
>
> > > > > > * Visit our other community athttp://www.PoliticalForum.com/
> > > > > > * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
> > > > > > * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
>
> > > > > > ---
> > > > > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> > > > Groups
> > > > > > "PoliticalForum" group.
> > > > > > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
> > send
> > > > an
> > > > > > email to politicalforum+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
> > > > > > For more options, visithttps://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>
> > > > --
> > > > --
> > > > Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
> > > > For options & help seehttp://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
>
> > > > * Visit our other community athttp://www.PoliticalForum.com/
> > > > * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
> > > > * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
>
> > > > ---
> > > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> > Groups
> > > > "PoliticalForum" group.
> > > > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
> > an
> > > > email to politicalforum+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
> > > > For more options, visithttps://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>
> > --
> > --
> > Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
> > For options & help seehttp://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
>
> > * Visit our other community athttp://www.PoliticalForum.com/
> > * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
> > * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
>
> > ---
> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> > "PoliticalForum" group.
> > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> > email to politicalforum+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
> > For more options, visithttps://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

--
--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "PoliticalForum" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to politicalforum+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.



--
--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
 
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "PoliticalForum" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to politicalforum+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
 
 

--
--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
 
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "PoliticalForum" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to politicalforum+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.