Sunday, 16 June 2013

Obama Demands Court Uphold His "Right" To Ignore Constitution





Obama Demands Court Uphold His "Right" To Ignore Constitution

AUGUST 15, 2012 BY DOUG BOOK 80 COMMENTS

Obama's Department of Justice is demanding a federal judge dismiss the injunction with which she sought to uphold the constitutional rights of the American people.

On May 16th, federal judge Kathleen Forrest granted a preliminary injunction to plaintiffs in a lawsuit filed against Barack Obama and the National Defense Authorization Act of 2012 (NDAA), striking down those sections of the Act that provide the president the power to indefinitely detain American citizens without benefit of their 5th and 6th Amendment rights.

Under the terms of the Act, Obama had been given exclusive authority to direct members of the US military to arrest and imprison anyone he believed to have "substantially supported" al Qaeda, the Taliban, or "associated forces." When pressed by plaintiff's attorneys about the practical extent of this authority, government lawyers admitted "…the NDAA does give the president the power to lock up people like journalist Chris Hedges and peaceful activists," admitting that "…even war correspondents could be locked up indefinitely under the NDAA."

And when asked by the judge what it meant to be an "associated force", Obama's lawyers "…claimed the right to refrain from offering any clear definition of [the] term, or clear boundaries of the president's power under [the] law." In short, it is the federal government's scheme that the Act remain so vague that a corrupt and power-hungry Administration may imprison virtually anyone it considers a threat to its pursuit of absolute power.

On July 25th, Administration lawyers filed papers demanding Judge Forrest's preliminary injunction NOT be made permanent. In the filing, Obama made it clear his Administration would ignore the court and its injunction regardless of what the judge may decide, claiming incorrectly that "…[the] injunction would have 'nil' effect, for the government would continue to possess the identical detention authority under the 2001 Authorization for Use of Military Force…" Of course, that is a lie, as the AUMF applies only to known members of al Qaeda or the Taliban.

Most indicative of the Obama Administration's contempt for Judge Forrest, the law, and the American people was government attorney Benjamin Torrance's claim that it was "the Obama Administration's position" NDAA detention provisions do not apply to American citizens living in the US. Judge Forrest responded by quoting Chief Justice Roberts, who wrote in a 2010 case that the Supreme Court "…would not uphold an unconstitutional statute merely because the government promised to use it reasonably." So much for Judge Forrest's faith in the validity and value of Obama's signing statement promise to not employ his Section 1021 authority to indefinitely detain the American public!

Yet incredibly, when pressed on the issue, this Obama mouthpiece suggested to Forrest that concerns about the president's detention powers were excessive as American citizens would, after all, have the ability to file  a writ of habeas corpus should they be illegally or improperly jailed! "How long does [such a] petition take," asked Forrest? When Torrance refused to answer, the Judge continued, "Several years, right"?

So not only did Obama's attorney lie about his Marxist boss's corrupt intentions; he actually claimed that the abuse of American citizens was somehow acceptable because those unconstitutionally imprisoned might ask that the charges against them be produced after ONLY a few years behind bars!

Judge Forrest will soon decide whether to make the injunction permanent. Every citizen must watch very carefully for that ruling, as the "mainstream" media has ignored the story completely. We must all hope the Judge will not be intimidated by this corrupt Regime as so many of her colleagues have been before her.

Follow Coach at twitter.com @KcoachcCoach



__._,_.__





   
__,_._,___


--
--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
 
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "PoliticalForum" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to politicalforum+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
 
 

Fwd: Welcome to Heller Foundation News and Alerts



--------

Hi Mr. Carpenter,

Welcome to Heller Foundation News and Alerts  You have verified your e-mail address.  Thank you for supporting the Second Amendment and the Right to keep and bear arms.

Warm Regards,
The Heller Foundation

http://www.hellerfoundation.com

If the above URL is not a clickable link simply copy it and paste it in your web browser.

--
--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
 
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "PoliticalForum" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to politicalforum+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
 
 

Re: UK: If it’s a boy, will the new Royal Baby be named Mohammed?

Uhm.....No. 
 
Her Majesty Is Not Amused.....
 
 


On Sun, Jun 16, 2013 at 3:16 PM, Travis <baconlard@gmail.com> wrote:




BareNakedIslam posted: "After all, 'Mohammed' is the most popular name for baby boys in Great Britain. And what a fitting name it would be for the future king of a country that is culturally suicidal, rapidly allowing itself to be destroyed from within by expanding Islamization "

New post on BARE NAKED ISLAM

UK: If it's a boy, will the new Royal Baby be named Mohammed?

by BareNakedIslam

After all, 'Mohammed' is the most popular name for baby boys in Great Britain. And what a fitting name it would be for the future king of a country that is culturally suicidal, rapidly allowing itself to be destroyed from within by expanding Islamization and out of control Muslim immigration. IndomitableRealist

Read more of this post

BareNakedIslam | June 16, 2013 at 2:36 pm | Categories: Islamic Britain | URL: http://wp.me/p276zM-UKd

Comment    See all comments

Unsubscribe or change your email settings at Manage Subscriptions.

Trouble clicking? Copy and paste this URL into your browser:
http://www.barenakedislam.com/2013/06/16/uk-if-its-a-boy-will-the-new-royal-baby-be-named-mohammed/




--
--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
 
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "PoliticalForum" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to politicalforum+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
 
 

--
--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
 
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "PoliticalForum" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to politicalforum+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
 
 

Fwd: Petition to Congress for NSA Investigation



---------- Forwarded message ----------


https://optin.stopwatching.us/

--
--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
 
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "PoliticalForum" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to politicalforum+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
 
 

UK: If it’s a boy, will the new Royal Baby be named Mohammed?





BareNakedIslam posted: "After all, 'Mohammed' is the most popular name for baby boys in Great Britain. And what a fitting name it would be for the future king of a country that is culturally suicidal, rapidly allowing itself to be destroyed from within by expanding Islamization "

New post on BARE NAKED ISLAM

UK: If it's a boy, will the new Royal Baby be named Mohammed?

by BareNakedIslam

After all, 'Mohammed' is the most popular name for baby boys in Great Britain. And what a fitting name it would be for the future king of a country that is culturally suicidal, rapidly allowing itself to be destroyed from within by expanding Islamization and out of control Muslim immigration. IndomitableRealist

Read more of this post

BareNakedIslam | June 16, 2013 at 2:36 pm | Categories: Islamic Britain | URL: http://wp.me/p276zM-UKd

Comment    See all comments

Unsubscribe or change your email settings at Manage Subscriptions.

Trouble clicking? Copy and paste this URL into your browser:
http://www.barenakedislam.com/2013/06/16/uk-if-its-a-boy-will-the-new-royal-baby-be-named-mohammed/




--
--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
 
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "PoliticalForum" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to politicalforum+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
 
 

Vigilante Hackers of ‘Anonymous’ send a message to radical Islamist group Sharia4Belgium





BareNakedIslam posted: "I do not endorse Anonymous because they always go against groups I support and support groups that I do not. But even a broken clock is right twice a day. 'Anonymous' has made a video threatening one of Anjem Choudary's affiliates, Sharia for Belgium. It"

New post on BARE NAKED ISLAM

Vigilante Hackers of 'Anonymous' send a message to radical Islamist group Sharia4Belgium

by BareNakedIslam

I do not endorse Anonymous because they always go against groups I support and support groups that I do not. But even a broken clock is right twice a day. 'Anonymous' has made a video threatening one of Anjem Choudary's affiliates, Sharia for Belgium. It will be interesting to see what they actually do, what […]

Read more of this post

BareNakedIslam | June 16, 2013 at 1:59 pm | Categories: Just the Facts | URL: http://wp.me/p276zM-UK2

Comment    See all comments

Unsubscribe or change your email settings at Manage Subscriptions.

Trouble clicking? Copy and paste this URL into your browser:
http://www.barenakedislam.com/2013/06/16/vigilante-hackers-of-anonymous-send-a-message-to-radical-islamist-group-sharia4belgium/




--
--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
 
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "PoliticalForum" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to politicalforum+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
 
 

Another product warning from China



 

Another serious problem with defective Chinese products. Where will it end!!
Beware!!!!!!!
Walmart is selling lounge chairs made in China, the plastic is very
, very cheap and thin.  Purchase at your own risk.



Those cheap Wal-Mart chairs.
Don't buy them, or this could happen to you or someone you know!!!

 

 

 


    
   



--
--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
 
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "PoliticalForum" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to politicalforum+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
 
 

A Case of Interpretation



 

 A Case of Interpretation:

A real southern gentleman went to Las Vegas.  Sitting in a Cocktail lounge, he beckoned the waitress and said quietly, "Miss, y'all sure are a luvly, luvly lady. Can ah persuade y'all to give me a piece of ass?"


"Wow, that's the most direct proposition I've ever had!", gasped the girl.Then she looked around the room, smiled and said, "Sure, why not? You're an attractive guy too, and it's pretty slow here right now, so why don't we just slip away up to your room?" 


When they returned half an hour later, the man sat down at the same table and the waitress smiled at him and asked, "Will there be anything else?"


"Why yes," replied the southern gentleman.  "Ah sure 'preciate what y'all just did for me.  It was real sweet and right neighbourly of y'all. 

But where ah come from in Alabama, we lack our bourbon real cold, so ah still need a piece of ass for mah drink."


--   "If you want others to be happy, practice compassion.  If you want to be happy, practice compassion."  - Dali Lama




--
--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
 
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "PoliticalForum" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to politicalforum+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
 
 

Welcome to a CHINESE Walmart


 
 


 
Welcome to a CHINESE Walmart 



And we thought our Wal-Marts had it all.


Crocodiles. 



Bulk Rice. 



Mixed meat for the choosing. (I'm sure they all washed their hands first!!!) This is all so sanitary, isn't it?



Turtles and frogs. Yum, Yum!!



You guess!
 (It looks familiar, but definitely not something that I've eaten or going to! Those are bull penises.) 



Wal-mart Brand Spirits
 



Rib Cages. (From what?) (or who?) So sanitary again! 


Assorted Dried Reptiles. (I was actually craving that! Honest)
 


Beautiful Boxes Of Liquor. 


Frogs. 



A Large Selection Of Chopsticks.


Ducks on a rack (They say it tastes just like chicken!) 



Great Value Brand Beef Granules.



Pig Faces. (I'm drooling all over my shirt!!!) 








Diet Water. (HMMM.)
 




Meat Water. (Notice the flavors on the bottles) 



Specialty Pickles.
 (Just like "Cracker Jacks"--a prize in every jar!) 


100% Powdered Horse Milk (Genghis Khan Special)


    

 

 

__._,_.___
            


         
Yahoo! Groups
 
.


--
--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
 
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "PoliticalForum" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to politicalforum+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
 
 

AT&T to Load iPhones With Emergency Alerts From Obama - That You Can't Switch Off




 

http://drudgegae.iavian.net/r?hop=http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2013/06/att-to-load-iphones-with-emergency-alerts-from-obama-that-you-cant-switch-off/?utm_source=twitterfeed

 

 

www.thegatewaypundit.com

AT&T to Load iPhones With Emergency Alerts From Obama – That You Can't Switch Off


Just in case you want more Obama in your life…
AT&T is loading iPhones with emergency alerts from Barack Obama…
That you can't switch off.

Engadget reported:

AT&T has begun rolling out Wireless Emergency Alerts updates for iPhone 4S and 5, so you won't be the last folks to know if the entire northern hemisphere is about to be covered in ice à la Day After Tomorrow.

You'll receive a notification from the carrier when your update is ready, but only if you're using iOS 6.1 or higher.

Once installed, AMBER and Emergency alerts are automatically sent to your phone unless you switch them off via Settings. However, should you be tired of Obama, just know that there's no way to switch off Presidential alerts.

So now Barack can track your calls and send you messages, too.
Hat Tip Michael

 



__._,_.___





   
__,_._,___


--
--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
 
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "PoliticalForum" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to politicalforum+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
 
 

No Constitution, no borders, no USA



--------
 

http://www.jewishworldreview.com/0613/west0614143.php3

 

June 14, 2013/ 6 Tammuz, 5773

No constitution, no borders, no USA

By Diana West


At what point does it become clear that we no longer inhabit America?

When we "Press 2," not "1" for English?

When a National Social Security Number syncs an electronic identity that the government hospital provided us at birth to track us till death?

When borders are no more, but the Surveillance State always knows where we are?

Ours is the age of dislocation before realization: The United States of America no longer exists. Why? How? The answer is simple, tragic and outrageous: Government officials, elected and unelected, with precious exceptions, no longer preserve, protect and defend the U.S. Constitution. Instead, they do whatever it takes to beat it, flout it and ignore it. Worse, We, the People, let them.

This can't go on. Otherwise our country-'tis-of-thee becomes a melody to be forgotten, a mirage of a tradition more storybook than real every day. Nowhere is this more the case, of course, than in Washington, D.C., where absolute unaccountability corrupts absolutely, where echoing down the cool, white marble halls of power, hollow men and women trample sovereignty and citizenship in a pathway to American betrayal. And I haven't even gotten to Congress, busy, busy "reforming" the illegal alien crisis they antiseptically refer to as "immigration," while considering passage of a $940 billion "farm bill," 80 percent of which will fund food stamps. These two laws alone can institutionalize the lawlessness of the land and make countless more Americans wards of the state.

Meanwhile, there is in Washington a faceless power-mongery that lives and works in the shadows. City by city, rural state by rural state, its mechanisms of "immigration," "refugee resettlement," and socialist government programs overwhelm a near-impotent citizenry with alien cultures, religions, languages and traditions.

 


There is no "melting pot" out there, nor is there even residual belief in one -- particularly not on the part of the state. Most of our new peoples will never embrace American constitutional virtues en masse to perpetuate them because their own sponsor, their own lifeline, is the mega-state that brought them here and supports them.

This goes for newcomers from the Hispano-sphere, 75 percent of whom, Pew reported in 2012, believe the U.S. government isn't big enough and want more government services. It also goes for Muslim "refugee resettlement" populations, willfully deployed by this same power-mongery to displace and erase what we may one day look back on as just another indigenous culture that Washington overlords destroyed.

Then there is the faceless power-mongery that transforms the country, ironically, in the name of "national security." How can "national security" be achievable in an America without borders? It is a post-9/11 fact that more than one million Americans, government employees and contactors, now have "top-secret" access. They monitor our electronic lives, and collect all of our telephone numbers, something we have learned from the completely unauthorized but vital disclosures of Edward Snowden. This mass monitoring, we are told repeatedly, is what it takes to prevent "another 9/11."

Never mind those pinprick jihad attacks in Boston, Arkansas or Fort Hood. In fact, never mind jihad, period. This same Surveillance State has officially eliminated jihad as a subject to be taught or studied by security agencies and the military. In this way, every one of us becomes a suspect.

"Why do you need every telephone number?" NBC's Andrea Mitchell asked Director of National Intelligence James Clapper. "Why is it such a broad vacuum cleaner approach?"

"Well, you have to start someplace," Clapper replied.

Incredibly, this deaf, dumb and blind vacuum cleaner approach is touted as effective enough to have prevented 9/11 in the first place. So stresses former CIA and NSA chief Michael Hayden, a booster of the warrantless "data mining" of the PRISM program and the mass collection of all Americans' telephone records.

The mendacity of this rationale is as appalling as the hyper-state it enables. Just ask the airline ticket taker in Boston who, constricted by "political correctness" forced herself to tell the al-Qaida hijackers to "have a nice flight" rather than investigate their strange pre-boarding behavior.

If our leaders really wanted to prevent "another 9/11," they would have long ago admitted the obvious: that the world of Islam, from its terrorists to its kings, is engaged in the latest historical cycle of jihad to extend the reach of Islamic law (sharia). They would have decided that "profiling" isn't worse than terrorism. They would have halted Islamic immigration not only to stop more jihad cells from forming but also to prevent Constitution-endangering, pro-sharia demographics from forming, too. They would have sharply curtailed travel, and particularly return travel from jihad nations such as Chechnya and Pakistan. They would have long ago blocked U.S. institutions, including colleges, media organizations and banks, from accepting millions of dollars from sharia-ruled dictatorships. They would have closed down mosques in America where jihad is preached and supported.

Above all, they would have secured our borders rather than leave them open all these post-9/11 years. Of course, that would mean re-establishing and defending those borders, both literally and figuratively.

That's one thing Washington, D.C., will never tolerate.

 

__._,_.___
Reply via web post Reply to sender Reply to group Start a New Topic Messages in this topic (1)
Recent Activity:
.

__,_._,___

--
--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
 
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "PoliticalForum" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to politicalforum+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
 
 

No Turning Point AN IMPORTANT READ






No Turning Point

Posted on June 14, 2013 by Baron Bodissey

Our Spanish correspondent Hermes returns with an essay on the foreclosure by the Western power elites of any alternative to the disastrous collapse of the ideological and political Multicultural regime that they have worked so long to build.

No Turning Point
by Hermes

Europe is changing. Much of what once was, will never be again. Events that fifteen years ago people would have considered unthinkable are becoming an everyday reality in the streets of Paris, London or Stockholm. And things that now — in spite of what is currently unfolding — seem unthinkable, are likely to become reality, no matter how painful or dreadful those may still seem.

Men are hardly capable of foreseeing the future, perhaps not out of ignorance or lack of knowledge of what is in happening in that given space and at that given time, but out of ideological and subjective considerations regarding their own selves and events taking place in that given space and time.

In the words of Enoch Powell, who may have been one of the few in history who, when needed, had the level of ideological detachment and objective vision of history-to-come needed to prevent future social collapses and chaos:

The supreme function of statesmanship is to provide against preventable evils. In seeking to do so, it encounters obstacles which are deeply rooted in human nature.

One is that by the very order of things such evils are not demonstrable until they have occurred: at each stage in their onset there is room for doubt and for dispute whether they be real or imaginary. By the same token, they attract little attention in comparison with current troubles, which are both indisputable and pressing: whence the besetting temptation of all politics to concern itself with the immediate present at the expense of the future.

So following the chain of events that has recently taken place, the Prime Ministers of England and Sweden were by definition charged by their respective people with the function of providing against such preventable horrors as the decapitation of a British soldier in broad daylight in a street of London, or such preventable actions as the massive destruction of public and private property in Stockholm.

But how is it even possible that these events still took place? How were these awful events, which may be perfectly seen as dreadful omens for the future, possible at all?

In looking for the underlying reasons for the seemingly irresponsible and short-sighted behavior by part of politicians, one may be compelled to take into account those elements in human behavior which predetermine the deeds of statesmen. Desire for power and the will to keep it are most likely to be the personal goals, and because of this, the top elements influencing the psyche of these kinds of people. The ruling political and ideological current is also worth taking into consideration, since this has influence on the broader acceptance of a leader in society. This means that for a leader to be acknowledged and accepted by a majority of people, this leader must not only follow, but be the embodiment of the mainstream ideological current present among the population. And by willingly taking on and professing that given ideological current, the leader and those standing around automatically lose the sight of one of their eyes, metaphorically speaking. Or better said, they willingly renounce it.

And we unavoidably arrive at the issue of political correctness and the illogical left-liberal notion of racism which pervades the entire Western society. The MSM are always busy labelling such things as bacon being sent to an Imam or chopped swine heads being thrown at the door of mosques as "racist attack" against that religion called Islam. But such appalling and treacherous acts as cooking a Christ are never deemed as a racist attack against the religion called Christianity. So interestingly enough, burning a Quran is declared to be a crime against humanity and a sign of the resurgence of "fascism", but roasting Jesus or publicly burning a crucifix hardly attracts any attention by any part of the MSM.

Racism exists. Discriminating against people on grounds of their skin color or race is racism indeed, regardless whether the person who is the subject of discrimination is black, white or of another color. But (as left-liberals express themselves) "attacking" Islam is not "racism", for if it were, then attacking Christianity should also be called "racism". For it is a religion, too.

So following the left-liberal "logic" regarding this word, Islam must automatically be deemed the most racist ideology on the face of the earth, since Islam has been fighting and destroying all religions and cultures for over 1400 years. It is precisely the left-liberals who with their liberal and arbitrary usage of the word "racist" turn Islam into the embodiment of racism.

According to Aje Carlbom, a Swedish academic and author of a critical study on Swedish immigration policy, "Anyone who wants to regulate immigration is immediately classified as a nationalist, which also implies a racist as well." He says, "It is still almost impossible to debate this question."

It is almost impossible to debate this question because debating it would also mean debating a way of thinking which has been leading the way for the entire West since the end of WW2. For what happened during the darkest years of European history had left an effect so profound in the collective mind of the West that it has affected it beyond rationality and basic common sense, shaking and overturning the most basic tenets of the European identity and Western Civilization. The diabolical tenets of the ideology which arose during that period did not cease to poison Western Civilization with the end of WW2. Those principles mutated into a new, seemingly antithetical ("antiracism") ideological monster which has been since then steadily destroying Western Civilization. And this monster has been successfully used by the left-liberal elites in order to grab the power and sweep away any trace of counterweight to the almighty ruling power. That is, any trace of free speech and democracy.

It is true that "The days when these ruling elites could claim that they 'didn't know' the effects of their policies are now long gone", but the point here is that they do not want to acknowledge that the effects of their policies are evil and lead to the irreversible destruction of Western Culture and Civilization. Neither want to nor can, because this would mean the very end of what they have been striving for decades. This would mean the willingly acceptance by part of them of the downfall of the ideology which has been for decades dictating what is right and what is wrong for Westerners. An entire transnational ideological empire is grounded on this ideology and way of seeing the world. And the ruling elites will not voluntarily acknowledge that what they have been preaching, professing and enforcing on the Western peoples is nothing but a utopian fantasy lacking every trace of sanity, yet earth-shattering events will usher in the end of this ideological leviathan. For this cannot be stopped now in a rational and civilized way. The inertial energy of it is now far too powerful, and the elites are irrevocably trapped in their own ideological grip. It is like a little snowball which was set in motion decades ago. And the tiny and harmless snowball has now turned into what one may by now expect. And no one (except for those like Enoch Powell) dared nor bothered worrying about what it might turn into.

This is likely to be the reason why Mr. Cameron said that the deadly attack on serviceman Lee Rigby was a "Betrayal of Islam". He cared more about Islam itself, that is, in a broader sense about safekeeping the ruling transnational ideological empire upon which the power of the ruling left-liberal elites is grounded, and also assuring the future voter base which will eventually grant them another term in power, than about the brutal murder of an unarmed member of the British army. This could rightly be understood as high treason against the British armed forces.

In the words of Paul Weston:

Left-liberals have committed treason and continue to commit treason on an ongoing basis. They are not held to account because the government and the police are also committing treason, and the head of the government is David Cameron, a man who describes himself as a Conservative but who is, in reality, just another left-liberal traitor.

Kjell Lindgren, the spokesman for Stockholm Police declared that: "We don't know why they are doing this, there is no answer to it". These people are incapable of finding an answer to this because the situation itself does not fit with their notions of "openness" and "tolerance", those notions which have been inoculated into Western populations from the very beginning. They "naïvely" (let's express ourselves as mildly as possible) extrapolate themselves into the other cultures they allow in, taking for granted that immigrants will give up their own ways of seeing the world and resolving conflicts, and willingly adopt the ways of behaving of the host culture. Besides, westerners have been taught that "all cultures are equal", so by definition, all members of all cultures are likely to behave the same way.

How fatal an indoctrination…

People who profess Multiculturalism, "antiracism" and the idea that more immigrants are needed cannot exclude a certain religion or culture out of the whole mass, because this would cast serious doubts on Multiculturalism itself, thus giving rise to a precedent case of the exclusion of a given culture or religion, and also because this would take away from them the unbeatable advantage they have over their political opponents, whom they can only shun and sweep away by calling them what they usually do — racist, fascist, etc…

Thus, the British PM's reaction was a fairly predictable and "logical" one. By trying to whitewash Islam, he and others are also trying desperately to safeguard their positions and ideological guidelines. They are well aware of the effects of their policies, but they will never ever acknowledge that truth of the inherent danger posed by Islam. They will never acknowledge that a given culture from the unholy multicultural melting pot is provably lethal to any other society or culture. Those people will never ever acknowledge the truth which is admitted even by ex-Muslims themselves. Perhaps they are even well aware that people have knowledge of their lies, but this fact does not matter to them. Neither were communist leaders bothered that people knew the truth, although they were well aware that many many people were secretly listening to the Radio Free Europe. They were well aware of this because they were busy intercepting the radio transmissions and running expensive technical facilities with the aim of distorting the broadcasts of the radio as much as possible, especially when political magazines were aired.

But the most notable about the multicultural policies of the ruling left-liberal elites which are being successfully exploited by Islam in order to infiltrate the West is that both David Cameron and Fredrik Reinfeldt need to pursue them if they want to survive politically. They simply cannot avoid the factor of immigration and the potential weight it may have in future presidential elections. Sweden alone in 2006 accepted almost as many asylum applications from Iraqis as all other European countries did combined. Native Swedes, who live in a country which was one of the most ethnically homogeneous nations in the world only thirty years ago, may well turn into a minority in their own country within a few decades, so that it shall be the immigrant vote which will truly count. And it was thanks to the Muslim votes that François Hollande won the French presidential election a year ago.

So no politician belonging to the elites seems to care much about a French soldier being stabbed in the neck, public and private property being massively destroyed, or a British one being beheaded in broad daylight in a street in London, so long as they can keep the power for themselves. And the only way for them to achieve this will be increasingly to rely on the votes of the ever-growing immigrant population. We have reached a stage in which people simply do not count, no matter who they are, or where they come from. The elites do not care about people in general, let alone the native population to which they belong. They do not care about truths and lies as long as they can keep the power in their hands, if not by deception or persuasion, then by force. This is the only issue which matters to them.

Of Britain it was written in 2008 that:

My bet is still on Britain, or possibly Denmark, as the first Western country to face a civil war due to mass immigration, but the Netherlands is a potential candidate as well. I just wonder whether the Dutch are already a broken nation.

Every single day we get more evidence that the authorities are totally incapable of protecting any semblance of security and freedom for its citizens. The only thing the state still seems to be capable of doing is indoctrinating our children with hatred of their own civilization and taking away our money so that it can be given to those who colonize our countries and abuse our children, verbally and physically.

And on Sweden, also in 2008, that:

Sweden has been known as a "model country" with an economic system as a third way between capitalism and Socialism, or enlightened Socialism as it has been called. In 2008, the "Swedish model" no longer refers to an economic success story (and the Swedish economy grew rapidly before the welfare state was established), but to a horror story of cultural suicide, Gramscian cultural Marxism, ideological censorship and repression of dissent. Sweden is not unique. Similar trends are evident all over the Western world. But Political Correctness is unusual in its severity here, in part because Sweden already viewed itself as an "ideological state," and the country is definitely ahead of the curve in ideological repression.

As for Britain, a few days ago a former MI6 chief openly admitted that the security forces are virtually powerless to stop atrocities like the Woolwich murder:

"I think it is incredibly hard to stop," he said. "When does a person who expresses radical views, who joins a radical group, flip over to be a violent extremist? To find the signals, the red flags as it were, I think is enormously hard."

As for Sweden, there is the declaration of Aje Carlbom, also made a few days ago, that:

"Anyone who wants to regulate immigration is immediately classified as a nationalist, which also implies a racist as well," he said. "It is still almost impossible to debate this question."

All predictions made by those who have been warning about the dangers threatening Europe are coming true. And this means that those predictions which have not yet been fulfilled are likely to come true, too. All those endowed with the capacity to foresee the long-term consequences of decisions being taken at a given time such as Enoch Powell, Lars Hedegaard, Fjordman, Udo Ulfkotte, Michael Stürzenberger and many others have been warning the West about what may happen if the actual left-liberal policies are pursued further on with no questioning nor criticism. In the words of a well-known blogger:

"The massive concentration of Muslims in major European cities will have dramatic consequences, some of which are already visible. If it is allowed to continue, it will destroy the coherence of society that is necessary for our legal systems to work. Increased urban insecurity means that the state is not able to guarantee the security of its citizens. If ordinary citizens feel that the state is no longer able to guarantee the safety of their loved ones, then perhaps native Europeans will create groups and clans of their own, to counter the Muslim clans. The result will be a re-tribalization of our countries. The downfall of the nation state, if it happens, will be chaotic, painful and bloody. Can it still be avoided? Only time will tell." — Defeating Eurabia, 2008 – p.116

Time is increasingly proving that this scenario is less and less avoidable, and the Woolwich attack was the clearest of signals for this. The elites cannot avoid their own downfall, but it will be the consequences of their own deeds which will bring them down together with their ideology. Nor can great social unrest and clashes be avoided. The time of avoidance is now over. Warnings have been made, but as Enoch Powell stated: "such evils are not demonstrable until they have occurred."This impossibility of demonstrating what may happen until it has already occurred was exploited by the left-liberal elites in order to sweep away any kind of counterbalance or criticism, even if it might have been truly constructive and worth hearing, and continue with their blind pursuit of power.

And we may soon see the dreadful outcome of this.



__._,_.___





   
__,_._,___


--
--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
 
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "PoliticalForum" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to politicalforum+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.