Sunday, 14 July 2013

What Bothered Me Most About the Zimmerman Trial


What Bothered Me Most About the Zimmerman Trial
Butler Shaffer
July 14, 2013

I did not watch the entirety of this trial, but I did watch most of the closing arguments.  There was a tone to the prosecution's summation to the jury that left me with the impression that the core of George Zimmerman's offense was that he was not a police officer. While giving lip-service to the propriety -- even the desirability -- of "neighborhood watch" practices, the state's prosecutors saw a conflict between ordinary people and "official" police officers doing what Zimmerman did.  Toward the end of the state's summation, it was said that if a person wanted to do what George Zimmerman did "you'd better have one of these" (whereupon a photo of a policeman's badge was projected onto the screen).

What the state was implicitly acknowledging -- whether such was its intent or not -- was the real-world dual standard that operates on the streets of virtually every city in every state: a police officer will almost never be held to account, criminally, for wrongs committed against innocent victims. Take the identical facts in the Zimmerman case and change just one: have George Zimmerman be a city-appointed police officer. Is there anyone so na├»ve as to believe that his actions would have turned him into a criminal defendant?  Would the event have even made it into the media -- apart, perhaps, from a blurb news report on page 23 of the local newspaper? Because the state is defined as a system enjoying a monopoly on the use of violence, its practitioners must be shielded from the consequences of their violent acts.

I shall not hold my breath awaiting the media babblers addressing this issue. The institutionalized keepers-of-the-questions-to-be-asked would never be so foolish or careless as to allow such a thought to surface.

Obama's Lawlessness




Barack Obama's Lawlessness

Peter Wehner | @Peter_Wehner 07.12.2013 - 2:30 PM

 

http://www.commentarymagazine.com/2013/07/12/barack-obamas-lawlessness/

 

Both Charles Krauthammer and Ramesh Ponnuru have spoken about the lawlessness of the Obama administration. Examples include (but are not limited to) unilaterally delaying implementation of the Affordable Care Act's employer mandate, issuing health-care edicts that undermine the Religious Freedom Restoration Act, making unconstitutional "recess appointments" to the National Labor Relations Board and the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, refusing to enforce current immigration laws related to illegal immigrants who were brought to America as children, and waving welfare work requirements.

This is all part of a pattern in which Mr. Obama enforces laws he likes and refuses to enforce (or unilaterally alters) laws he disagrees with. I suppose the temptation to act as a potentate is understandable; but it also happens to be illegal. The president, after all, has the constitutional duty to "take care that the Laws be faithfully executed" (see Article II, Section 3 for more).

One of the reasons there isn't a firestorm of protest against the president's contempt for the rule of law is that that apart from a few honorable exceptions, the press doesn't care and therefore isn't covering this story. Let's just say that if the same kind of violations had been committed by presidents with the last names of oh, say, Bush or Reagan, you can be sure the New York Times, the New York Review of Books, Politico, CNN's Anderson Cooper, NPR, and the major news networks would all be covering the story.

The problem here is that a dangerous precedent is being set by the president. To understand why, consider the words of Thomas More to Roper in Robert Bolt's A Man for All Seasons:

And when the last law was down, and the Devil turned round on you—where would you hide, Roper, the laws all being flat? This country is planted thick with laws from coast to coast—man's laws, not God's—and if you cut them down—and you're just the man to do it—do you really think you could stand upright in the winds that would blow then?

Barack Obama is doing his part to cut down from coast to coast the laws he doesn't much care for. He does so because he's a progressive who believes the ends (advancing a liberal agenda) justifies the means (lawlessness). But unfortunately in the future the winds will come–and when they do, and when Americans cannot stand upright in them, it may dawn on some folks that our contempt for the rule of law was nurtured and flowered during the Obama era.

 



__._,_.___





   
__,_._,___


--
--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
 
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "PoliticalForum" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to politicalforum+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
 
 

Collapse of Law under Obama





http://www.nationalreview.com/article/353328/obamas-rule-decree-andrew-c-mccarthy?splash=

 

July 13, 2013 4:00 AM

Obama's Rule by Decree

The collapse of law is the Obama administration's most egregious scandal.

By Andrew C. McCarthy

Barack Obama has never been clear on the distinction between sovereign and servant, between the American people and those, including himself, elected to do the people's business. We saw that yet again this week with the president's unilateral rewrite of the Bataan Death March known as the Affordable Care Act — Obamacare. For this president, laws are not binding expressions of the popular will, but trifling recommendations to be ignored when expedient.

The collapse of law — not just Obamacare but law in general — is the Obama administration's most egregious scandal. With the IRS here, Benghazi there, and Eric Holder's institutionalized malevolence crowding the middle, it gets little direct attention. Perhaps it is so ubiquitous, so quotidian, that we've become inured to it.

Above all else, though, the office of the president was created to take care that the laws be faithfully executed. For this president, to the contrary, law is non-existent — and not merely law in the traditional sense of our aspiration to be "a nation of laws not men." Obama has contorted the law into a weapon against our constitutional order of divided powers and equal protection for every American.

As with most things Obama, this Olympian outrage springs from a kernel of propriety. We want our laws enforced, particularly when they reflect basic obligations of government in a free, civil society. Nevertheless, we know that the resources of government are finite, that laws are numerous and elastic, and that a federalist system implies a significant enforcement role for states. Thus, our legal system is premised on executive discretion. Not every law can or should be enforced to its fullest extent — nobody would want to live in that sort of society. To execute the laws faithfully is to remain mindful of the federal government's essential but finite role in our framework and to concentrate its limited resources on enforcement of the most vital laws.

As a practical matter, this necessitates selectivity — some laws will go unenforced, some wrongs unaddressed. With a president who acts in good faith, this is not a problem. For example, simple possession of prohibited narcotics is a federal crime. But it is also a state crime. Given the need to prioritize, it is sensible for the feds to focus their efforts on what the federal government was designed for — international and interstate challenges that the states are not well equipped to address. So the Justice Department targets major drug-importation and distribution networks, leaving less serious drug infractions to the local district attorneys. Notice: This does not mean the executive branch is effectively decriminalizing less serious drug offenses in contravention of Congress's statutes. It means the public's federal buck goes to where it gets the best bang.

The separation-of-powers principle also has implications for executive discretion. To promote liberty, the Framers constructed a central government of divided authorities in which each branch was given tools to check inevitable encroachments by the others. Congress has an irresistible propensity to enact laws that usurp the powers of the executive and the states, and that erode the rights of the people. But Congress can only write the laws. It must depend on the president to execute them.

A president who believes in good faith that a congressional act is constitutionally invalid may properly decline to enforce it — in fact, he would in good conscience be bound to decline — at least until the Supreme Court has ruled on its validity. Faithfully executing the laws has never mandated that a president enforce unconstitutional statutes.

But note that this is a matter of legal legitimacy, not policy preference. Faithful execution, abiding by the president's oath of office, means enforcing even those laws a president disagrees with on policy grounds if the laws are plainly constitutional. The Constitution gives Congress a wide berth to enact unwise laws, to say nothing of perfectly sensible laws that are uncongenial to a hard-left ideologue. There is nothing wrong with a president's working to change those laws; in the meantime, though, he breaks his solemn pledge by failing to enforce them.

Bona fide concerns over resource allocation and constitutionality are narrow exceptions to the general rule that obliges presidents to execute the laws. In Obama's hands, however, executive discretion has become an affirmative license for lawbreakers. Worse, it has seamlessly devolved into an invitation — an inducement — to official malfeasance. Again, only the executive branch can enforce the law. When executive-branch officials know that illegal actions on their part will not be pursued, they are encouraged to commit them.

Thus Obama eschews enforcement of the immigration laws not because they are comparatively trivial or adequately covered by state police — indeed, his most notable enforcement efforts are directed not at illegal aliens but at states who dare attempt to see to the law's faithful execution. Obama's discretionary non-enforcement is not a good-faith husbanding of federal resources but a cynical enterprise in rewarding lawbreakers and cultivating them as a dependable political constituency. His Justice Department practices racial discrimination in the enforcement of the civil-rights laws, a grievous betrayal of the Constitution, in order to appease and empower his political base.

The faithful execution of laws is never partisan; under Obama, the execution of laws is intensely partisan. He purports to make "recess appointments" when Congress is not in recess. He skirts Congress's constitutional war powers by pretending that attacking another country (Libya) is not making war. If his core supporters are damaged by the suffocating laws he champions — most prominently, Obamacare — he claims the power to "waive" their provisions selectively. Meanwhile, huge bureaucracies are encouraged, expressly or by nod-and-wink, to harass the president's opponents and push forward his redistributionist, production-strangling, Islamist-empowering agenda. The executive order — formerly an intra-branch efficiency device designed to organize the exercise of the president's constitutional powers and the enforcement of Congress's laws — has effectively become legislation, the president substituting his edicts for our laws.

In a vibrant, pluralistic society, law, as an expression of the sovereign will, is unavoidably a product of compromise. In the contentious process, the competing sides bend; they settle on something that neither, given their druthers, would support; and they honorably agree to abide by the result. Under Obama, however, massive laws are enacted — such that no one can conceivably know what the law is. Then the president enforces the parts he approves of, contemptuously disregards the parts that enticed naysayers into compromising, and presumes to amend or repeal inconvenient provisions at his whim.

That is not the rule of law. It is how a dictatorship works.

 



__._,_.___
 




   
__,_._,___


--
--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
 
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "PoliticalForum" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to politicalforum+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
 
 

America’s Got Talent loves former Marine and his non-PC song about coal





Dr. Eowyn posted: "Former Marine Jimmy Rose Willie Deutsch of NetRightDaily.com draws our attention to something remarkable -- a non-PC song   sung by a non-PC 4-year veteran of the U.S. Marine Corps actually received rave reviews from all four of the America's Got Talent "
Respond to this post by replying above this line

New post on Fellowship of the Minds

America's Got Talent loves former Marine and his non-PC song about coal

by Dr. Eowyn

Jimmy RoseFormer Marine Jimmy Rose

Willie Deutsch of NetRightDaily.com draws our attention to something remarkable -- a non-PC song   sung by a non-PC 4-year veteran of the U.S. Marine Corps actually received rave reviews from all four of the America's Got Talent judges.

Jimmy Rose's original country music song, "Coal Keeps the Lights On," is about the Kentucky coal mines where the former Marine got his first job. The song is also directly counter to Obama's recently announced war on demonization of coal.

Willie Deutsch is Editor-in-Chief for NetRightDaily.com, and Social Media Director for Americans for Limited Government.

H/t my writer friend Robert K. Wilcox.

~Eowyn

Dr. Eowyn | July 14, 2013 at 1:39 pm | Tags: Jimmy Rose, Obama's war on coal | Categories: Conservatives, Culture War, Military, Obama | URL: http://wp.me/pKuKY-mtG

Comment    See all comments

Unsubscribe or change your email settings at Manage Subscriptions.

Trouble clicking? Copy and paste this URL into your browser:
http://fellowshipofminds.wordpress.com/2013/07/14/americas-got-talent-loves-former-marine-and-his-non-pc-song-about-coal/

Thanks for flying with WordPress.com



--
--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
 
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "PoliticalForum" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to politicalforum+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
 
 

The Leftist Courts, Leftist Media, and Black Racist Activists LOST







 

The Leftist Courts, Leftist Media, and Black Racist Activists LOST

 

RSS Feed

Sunday, July 14, 2013

By:

 Howard Galganov

This is not what you will read, see or hear anywhere within the mainstream media. But then again, it's much easier for the sanctimonious LEFT and the cowardly media to pretend, ignore, and lie – than to simply tell the truth.

Not only is the Zimmerman acquittal the right thing for the jury to have done. This case should have never come to court. 

Here is a six-foot PLUS Black guy with his head covered by a HOOD, walking around in a community in the darkness of night in a drizzling rain, that has had its share of crime. 

What would you have done under these circumstances if you were a resident of this community? How would you feel walking down a dark street under a drizzle of rain, seeing this tall BLACK guy with his head and face covered by a HOOD, who doesn't seem to belong in your community walking against you?

The Prosecutor LIED by withholding evidence from the Defense and the people, that would have shown a true picture of Trayvon Martin, opposed to the fabrication. For this, the Prosecutor should be prosecuted. 

This "kid" munching Skittles, as he was depicted, was nothing like he was portrayed. 

He was always in trouble in school, including being suspended at the time of the incident. He was a street fighter who by his own admission liked to hurt people. He was a drug user. And he was into the GANGSTA gun culture. 

That's not quite the same picture of this Black "ANGEL" the media and LEFT painted.

And according to Black Florida Democrat Representative Frederica Wilson: 

"Trayvon was hunted down like a rabid dog and shot in the street. He was racially profiled." And that's before she even knew squat about what happened.

And then there was Obama, who too couldn't wait to weigh-in on Trayvon Martin's side because Martin was Black. And that too was before Obama knew anything about the circumstances. 

I won't even go into what the usual BLACK RACE-BAITERS like Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton had to say. Nor will I discuss what the BLACK and LEFTIST entertainers and athletes had to say either, because I don't care what any of them think or say, beyond what their words can do to create real harm.

BUT HERE IS WHAT I WILL SAY WITHOUT GOING INTO GREAT DETAIL:

THE FACTS ARE THE FACTS . . . America's Black community, in spite of the HUNDREDS OF BILLIONS of dollars, or more likely a TRILLION dollars or more given to them in one way or another, and Affirmative Action they've received since the 1960's . . . they are the MOST FAILED culture in America.

IF YOU DON'T BELIEVE ME . . . CHECK IT OUT FOR YOURSELF:

Checkout . . . by all standards, which group is the most incarcerated? Which group has the least education and the highest scholastic dropout rate? Which group has the most single and unwed mothers? Which group is the largest recipient of food stamps and welfare? Which group has the highest murder rate? Which group glorifies murder, rape, misogyny, race-hate and cop killing in their music? 

And what does it say about the Black Community, when everyone is relived that they didn't RIOT after the verdict finding an innocent man to be innocent? 

HERE'S MY TAKE:

Not only is the Black community its own worst enemy, they are aided and abetted by the LEFT, to the point that all of their enormous failings are blamed on the White community, INCLUDING a young Black Guy who decided to punch out . . . in his own words "A CREEPY-ASS CRACKER."

And for those of you who might not know what a CRACKER is . . . it is the equivalent of a White person calling a Black person a Nigger. 

SO . . . LET ME END THIS WITH EVEN MORE CANDOR:

If you lived in an area where there were skulking young BLACK people wearing HOODS, walking around your community in the darkness of a drizzling night, you would beg for an ARMED George Zimmerman willing to keep you safe. 

And if you say no to this . . . you are either an IDIOT or a LIAR. 

Sorry if this editorial offends you. But, that's the way it is with the truth. 

Best Regards . . . Howard Galganov

N-PROFITS?



__._,_.___





   
__,_._,___


--
--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
 
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "PoliticalForum" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to politicalforum+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
 
 

Activist Lesbian & Democrat Mayoral Candidate Christine Quinn vows to close NYC public schools for two Muslim holidays if she become Mayor





BareNakedIslam posted: "I wonder if she knows Muslims will call for her execution for being a homosexual as Islam requires? NY Times  Christine C. Quinn, the City Council speaker and one of the leading Democratic candidates for mayor, walked into a clubhouse in Dyker Heights, B"

New post on BARE NAKED ISLAM

Activist Lesbian & Democrat Mayoral Candidate Christine Quinn vows to close NYC public schools for two Muslim holidays if she become Mayor

by BareNakedIslam

I wonder if she knows Muslims will call for her execution for being a homosexual as Islam requires? NY Times  Christine C. Quinn, the City Council speaker and one of the leading Democratic candidates for mayor, walked into a clubhouse in Dyker Heights, Brooklyn, just as people had started to eat and was escorted straight […]

Read more of this post

BareNakedIslam | July 14, 2013 at 3:05 pm | Categories: Islam in America | URL: http://wp.me/p276zM-VN1

Comment    See all comments

Unsubscribe or change your email settings at Manage Subscriptions.

Trouble clicking? Copy and paste this URL into your browser:
http://www.barenakedislam.com/2013/07/14/activist-lesbian-democrat-mayoral-candidate-christine-quinn-vows-to-close-nyc-public-schools-for-two-muslim-holidays-if-she-become-mayor/




--
--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
 
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "PoliticalForum" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to politicalforum+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
 
 

5 Books That Will Get You Banned From Britain




5 Books That Will Get You Banned From Britain

Posted By Robert Spencer On July 8, 2013

Planning a summer trip to London? So was I! But the British Home Office had other ideas, explaining in a kind letter to me that admitting me into the country would be "not conducive to the public good."

So let's say that the kids are nagging you to book that trip to see Big Ben and Buckingham Palace, but you just don't have the money or the time, and are looking for that golden letter from British Home Secretary Theresa May, closing the door to perfidious Albion to you forever. It's easy. All you have to do is do what I did: read a few books.

The Home Office's letter to me explained that I was banned because I said that Islam "is a religion and is a belief system that mandates warfare against unbelievers for the purpose for establishing a societal model that is absolutely incompatible with Western society," and that "because media and general government unwillingness to face the sources of Islamic terrorism these things remain largely unknown."

These horrifying quotes were apparently taken from a documentary I appeared in about ten years ago, Islam: What the West Needs to Know. I said these things because I had read a few books; if you dare to read them as well, you, too, might end up banned from Britain yourself.

1. Towards Understanding the Qur'an (The Islamic Foundation, 2008).

This is a one-volume translation of the Qur'an by Zafar Ishaq Ansari, plus commentary by Sayyid Abul A'la Mawdudi (also spelled Maududi). Mawdudi was a twentieth-century Islamic scholar and political leader in Pakistan. His influence is mainstream and international; he wrote a multivolume commentary on the Qur'an and numerous other works that can be found readily in Islamic bookstores in the U.S. and all over the West.

In this book he writes: "The purpose for which the Muslims are required to fight is not, as one might to think, to compel the unbelievers into embracing Islam. Rather, its purpose is to put an end to the suzerainty of the unbelievers so that the latter are unable to rule over people. The authority to rule should only be vested in those who follow the True Faith; unbelievers who do not follow this True Faith should live in a state of subordination. Anybody who becomes convinced of the Truth of Islam may accept the faith of his/her own volition. The unbelievers are required to pay jizyah (poll tax) in return for the security provided to them as the dhimmis ('Protected People') of an Islamic state. Jizyah symbolizes the submission of the unbelievers to the suzerainty of Islam."

You could almost get the idea that Mawdudi thought that Islam was a religion and a belief system that "mandates warfare against unbelievers for the purpose for establishing a societal model that is absolutely incompatible with Western society," as it would relegate non-Muslims to a second-class state of submission to the Muslims, paying a special tax and accepting other discriminatory regulations. Mawdudi had no trouble getting into Britain, but then again, he was a Muslim, and as I explained last week, you can talk about jihad violence in Britain, as long as you're for it. So if you're not a Muslim, get this book, and watch your mailbox for your ban letter.

2. The Decline of Eastern Christianity Under Islam by Bat Ye'or (Fairleigh Dickinson University Press, 1996).

Find out what Mawdudi meant by that "submission of the unbelievers to the suzerainty of Islam," and the payment of the jizyah. Bat Ye'or is the pioneering historian of that "state of subordination," dhimmitude, and in this book she reproduces a large number of contemporary documents that illustrate with harrowing vividness just what the "suzerainty of the Islam" meant to non-Muslims.

One ancient account of Muslim conquest and occupation of Egypt in the seventh century recounts how in one town, the Christians "came to the point of offering their children in exchange for the enormous sums that they had to pay each month, finding no one to help them because God had abandoned them and had delivered the Christians into the hands of their enemies." These were the "Protected People."

3. Sahih Muslim (translated by Abdul Hamid Siddiqui, Kitab Bhavan, 2000).

This is a collection of hadith, accounts of the words and deeds of Muhammad that Muslim scholars generally consider authentic and that are hence normative for Islamic law. In it, Muhammad affirms Mawdudi's words about fighting unbelievers: "Fight in the name of Allah and in the way of Allah. Fight against those who disbelieve in Allah. Make a holy war…When you meet your enemies who are polytheists, invite them to three courses of action. If they respond to any one of these, you also accept it and withhold yourself from doing them any harm. Invite them to (accept) Islam; if they respond to you, accept it from them and desist from fighting against them….If they refuse to accept Islam, demand from them the Jizya. If they agree to pay, accept it from them and hold off your hands. If they refuse to pay the tax, seek Allah's help and fight them." (4294)

So while Mawdudi, despite his mainstream popularity, could conceivably be one of the tiny minority of extremists who have hijacked the religion of peace, it is harder to make the case that Muhammad himself was among that tiny minority. That ban letter is looming ever closer.

4. Reliance of the Traveller: A Classic Manual of Islamic Sacred Law (translated by Nuh Ha Mim Keller, Amana Publications, 1999).

This is a manual of Islamic law endorsed as "conforming to the practice and faith of the orthodox Sunni community" by the most prestigious institution in Sunni Islam, Al-Azhar University in Cairo. It says that the leader of the Muslims "makes war upon Jews, Christians, and Zoroastrians…until they become Muslim or else pay the non-Muslim poll tax," and cites Qur'an 9:29 in support of this idea: "Fight those who do not believe in Allah and the Last Day and who forbid not what Allah and His messenger have forbidden-who do not practice the religion of truth, being of those who have been given the Book-until they pay the poll tax out of hand and are humbled." (o9.8)

In October 2001, right after 9/11, the New York Times called al-Azhar "the revered mosque, the distinguished university, the leading voice of the Sunni Muslim establishment." It quoted a Muslim cleric: "Al Azhar is the only institution in the world that has learned the moderate Islam and taught it in a moderate way without fanaticism, and without abiding by the teachings of a school that promotes rigidity or violence."

In June 2009 at al-Azhar, Barack Obama said: "For over a thousand years, Al-Azhar has stood as a beacon of Islamic learning, and for over a century, Cairo University has been a source of Egypt's advancement."

Yet this beacon of Islamic learning and moderate Islam also confirms my hateful and "Islamophobic" contention that "Islam mandates warfare against unbelievers for the purpose for establishing a societal model that is absolutely incompatible with Western society." How confusing! Have "Islamophobes" taken control of "the revered mosque, the distinguished university, the leading voice of the Sunni Muslim establishment"?

5. 1984 by George Orwell.

This one will get you banned in Britain for sure. The current regime there doesn't want you to catch on to their secrets.

Contribute to the legal fund that Pamela Geller and I have established to overturn the unjust banning of us both from the UK, here. Sign the petition asking that we be allowed into the country here.

 


Article printed from PJ Lifestyle: http://pjmedia.com/lifestyle

URL to article: http://pjmedia.com/lifestyle/2013/07/08/5-books-that-will-get-you-banned-from-britain/



__._,_.___





   
__,_._,___


--
--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
 
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "PoliticalForum" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to politicalforum+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
 
 

WOW! This Just In….. Amazing





Steve posted: " The NAACP has just had an emergency meeting of the board of directors. In the aftermath of the Not Guilty Verdict and their ever increasing relative obscurity. They have decided that it is time to change their name . From now on they will be known by "
Respond to this post by replying above this line

New post on Fellowship of the Minds

WOW! This Just In….. Amazing

by Steve

animated_paper_boy_news_flash_hg_wht1_1_

The NAACP has just had an emergency meeting of the board of directors. In the aftermath of the Not Guilty Verdict and their ever increasing relative obscurity. They have decided that it is time to change their name . From now on they will be known by the Acronym.

NAAAACABPBNWHNGZ

NATIONAL ASSOCIATION ADVANCEMENT AFRICAN AMERICANS COLORED AND BLACK PEOPLE BUT NOT WHITE HISPANICS NAMED GEORGE ZIMMERMAN.

Just thought I'd keep you up to date.     ~   Steve   ~

<img class="alignnone" alt="" src="http://smileyshack.files.wordpress.com/2010/12/smileyslaughing_lol_dielaughing_crying_100-100.gif" width="45" height="50" />

<img class="alignnone" alt="" src="http://smileyshack.files.wordpress.com/2010/12/smileyslaughing_lol_died_100-100.gif" width="47" height="22" />

<img class="alignnone" alt="" src="http://smileyshack.files.wordpress.com/2010/12/smileyslaughing_lol_computer_100-100.gif" width="60" height="35" />

<img class="alignnone" alt="" src="http://smileyshack.files.wordpress.com/2010/12/smileyslaughing_lol_crying_100-101.gif" width="50" height="41" />

<img class="alignnone" alt="" src="http://smileyshack.files.wordpress.com/2010/12/smileyslaughing_lol_died_100-101.gif" width="42" height="42" />

<img class="alignnone" alt="" src="http://smileyshack.files.wordpress.com/2010/12/smileyslaughing_sign_lol_100-101.gif" width="59" height="50" />

<img class="alignnone" alt="" src="http://smileyshack.files.wordpress.com/2010/12/smileyslaughing_lol_rofl__100-100.gif" width="35" height="26" />

XXXXXXXXX
<img class="alignnone" alt="" src="http://smileyshack.files.wordpress.com/2011/01/ssc_eek.gif" width="32" height="33" />xxxx

xxxxxxxxx xxx

<img class="alignnone" alt="" src="http://smileyshack.files.wordpress.com/2011/01/ssc_jawdrop2.gif" width="25" height="42" />

<img class="alignnone" alt="" src="http://smileyshack.files.wordpress.com/2011/01/ssc_hidingsofa.gif" width="80" height="57" />

<img class="alignnone" alt="" src="http://smileyshack.files.wordpress.com/2011/01/ssc_escape.gif" width="101" height="20" />

<img class="alignnone" alt="" src="http://smileyshack.files.wordpress.com/2011/01/ssc_jawdrop3.gif" width="18" height="106" />

Steve | July 14, 2013 at 10:01 am | Tags: Attachment theory, Computer file, Data, Publishers, Templates, Thumbnail, Tools, Wordpress | Categories: Humor, Race | URL: http://wp.me/pKuKY-mtu

Comment    See all comments

Unsubscribe or change your email settings at Manage Subscriptions.

Trouble clicking? Copy and paste this URL into your browser:
http://fellowshipofminds.wordpress.com/2013/07/14/wow-this-just-in-amazing/

Thanks for flying with WordPress.com



--
--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
 
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "PoliticalForum" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to politicalforum+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
 
 

Politichicks is pleased to offer The Pink Lady Gun Giveaway. -






Hoot! Add this to your christmas list!

 

 

http://politichicks.tv/pink-lady-38-special-gun-giveaway/#

 

 

 

Politichicks is pleased to offer The Pink Lady Gun Giveaway. –

 

See more at: http://politichicks.tv/pink-lady-38-special-gun-giveaway/#sthash.JBku0IAW.dpuf

 

 

 

 

Snippet:

 

This high-grade revolver features a two-tone finish, in pink. This makes the Pink Lady a fun and attractive piece and much less likely to be "borrowed" by the gentleman of the house!

 

<bh> they must not know me!!

 

This gun is perfect for your wife, mother, daughter, and granddaughter. It's easy to handle, fun to use, small enough to conceal, and a blast to fire. –

 

See more at: http://politichicks.tv/pink-lady-38-special-gun-giveaway/#sthash.JBku0IAW.7XDf97WV.dpuf

 



__._,





   
__,_._,___


--
--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
 
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "PoliticalForum" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to politicalforum+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
 
 

Sun 5 Dog Thoughts....






 

For All of you Dog Lovers

 

 

 

 

Dog Thoughts

 




    

 

 



__._,_.___





   
__,_._,___


--
--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
 
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "PoliticalForum" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to politicalforum+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.