Wednesday, 18 September 2013

Fwd: [New post] NEVER HIRE A MUSLIM Reason #102: CAIR Litigation Jihadists sue Cadillac dealership over Muslim name-calling




BareNakedIslam posted: " In a lawsuit filed today, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) joins Muslim Brotherhood front group CAIR-Chicago (Council on Anti-American Islamic Relations) charging Rizza Cadillac of violating federal law by creating a hostile work enviro"

New post on BARE NAKED ISLAM

NEVER HIRE A MUSLIM Reason #102: CAIR Litigation Jihadists sue Cadillac dealership over Muslim name-calling

by BareNakedIslam

In a lawsuit filed today, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) joins Muslim Brotherhood front group CAIR-Chicago (Council on Anti-American Islamic Relations) charging Rizza Cadillac of violating federal law by creating a hostile work environment for three Arab Muslim employees. CAIR-Chicago  In the lawsuit, the EEOC alleges that Adam Adawy, Medhat Adawy, and Mohammed El-Hajjami […]

Read more of this post

BareNakedIslam | September 18, 2013 at 9:34 pm | URL: http://wp.me/p276zM-XYu

Comment    See all comments

Unsubscribe or change your email settings at Manage Subscriptions.

Trouble clicking? Copy and paste this URL into your browser:
http://www.barenakedislam.com/2013/09/18/never-hire-a-muslim-reason-102-cair-litigation-jihadists-sue-cadillac-dealership-over-muslim-name-calling/




--
--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
 
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "PoliticalForum" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to politicalforum+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Fwd: [New post] KUDOS TO CAIRO! Senior Muslim Brotherhood official and former William J. Clinton Foundation employee arrested for inciting violence




BareNakedIslam posted: " Gehad el-Haddad served as one of the Muslim Brotherhood's top communications officials until Egyptian security forces seized him as part of a wider crackdown on officials loyal to ousted former President Mohamed Morsi. Free Beacon  Before emerging as a "

New post on BARE NAKED ISLAM

KUDOS TO CAIRO! Senior Muslim Brotherhood official and former William J. Clinton Foundation employee arrested for inciting violence

by BareNakedIslam

Gehad el-Haddad served as one of the Muslim Brotherhood's top communications officials until Egyptian security forces seized him as part of a wider crackdown on officials loyal to ousted former President Mohamed Morsi. Free Beacon  Before emerging as a top Brotherhood official and adviser to Morsi, el-Haddad served for five years as a top official at the Clinton Foundation, a nonprofit […]

Read more of this post

BareNakedIslam | September 18, 2013 at 8:42 pm | URL: http://wp.me/p276zM-XYh

Comment    See all comments

Unsubscribe or change your email settings at Manage Subscriptions.

Trouble clicking? Copy and paste this URL into your browser:
http://www.barenakedislam.com/2013/09/18/kudos-to-cairo-senior-muslim-brotherhood-official-and-former-william-j-clinton-foundation-employee-arrested-for-inciting-violence/




--
--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
 
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "PoliticalForum" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to politicalforum+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

My History of Libertarian Ideas, on YouTube



---------- 

 

A HISTORY OF LIBERTARIAN IDEAS, Part 1, George H. Smith

 

This is the first part of my YouTube series on the history of libertarian ideas. It runs around 35 minutes.

 

Ghs

__._,_.___
Reply via web post Reply to sender Reply to group Start a New Topic Messages in this topic (1)
Recent Activity:
Yahoo! Groups
Switch to: Text-Only, Daily DigestUnsubscribe

--
--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
 
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "PoliticalForum" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to politicalforum+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Get a free sticker!



---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Adam Parkhomenko, Ready for Hillary
Date: Wednesday, September 18, 2013
Subject: Flying off the shelves
To: Bruce Majors <majors.bruce@gmail.com>


Dear Bruce,

The Ready for Hillary bumper stickers have been flying off the shelves. It's inspiring that so many people are helping show the scope and power of the movement that we're building.

Now we're coming up on a big milestone – and we need your help to get there.

Will you help us reach our goal of sending out 100,000 stickers by requesting a free one today? It's a great way to show your support for Hillary.

This organization relies on the tireless support of people like you – and these stickers are just a small token of our appreciation.

We hope you'll request one and sport it proudly.

Click here to get your free Ready for Hillary sticker.

This is an exciting time for us as our grassroots movement continues to grow every day. Together we are going to show Hillary that we are ready for her to run in 2016!

Thank you for your support.

Adam Parkhomenko
Executive Director

 

 

 

 

 

 

Paid for by Ready For Hillary PAC | www.readyforhillary.com
Not Authorized by any Candidate or Candidate's Committee

 

 

If you believe you received this message in error or wish to no longer receive emails from us, please unsubscribe


--
--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
 
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "PoliticalForum" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to politicalforum+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Re: Big Hairy News

why does the black guy get to be labeled as crazy while the white guys are labeled as right wing activist?


On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 10:29 AM, Travis <baconlard@gmail.com> wrote:



True likeness of Feinstein.


Big Hairy News


Feinstein: Guns Are Making Us Crazy

Posted: 17 Sep 2013 10:08 PM PDT

WASHINGTON (BHN) - Sen. Diane Feinstein (RTRD-Ca) wasted no time in capitalizing on Monday's mass shooting at the Washington Navy Yard, by claiming guns are deliberately making many otherwise-normal individuals mentally unstable.

In a hurriedly-called press conference, the California Democrat said, "I ask you, why are these shooters always crazy? The reason is obvious, guns make people go insane - I know the only time I ever held one, I wet myself and attempted to shoot my nephew in the face. Thank God it was unloaded."

Feinstein is well known for her work in reducing gun-related injuries and tirelessly promoting the killing of unborn children.

 

Diane FeinsteinScarred for life: Sen. Diane Feinstein momentarily driven insane by a gun (file photo)


You are subscribed to email updates from Big Hairy News
To stop receiving these emails, you may unsubscribe now.
Email delivery powered by Google
Google Inc., 20 West Kinzie, Chicago IL USA 60610


--
--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
 
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "PoliticalForum" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to politicalforum+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

--
--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
 
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "PoliticalForum" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to politicalforum+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Fwd: [New post] So, You Wanna Vote in Mexico, Huh?





Sard posted: " Wow! I had no idea Mexico was such a racist country. *snicker*"

New post on therightplanet.com

So, You Wanna Vote in Mexico, Huh?

by Sard

Wow! I had no idea Mexico was such a racist country. *snicker*

Read more of this post

Sard | September 18, 2013 at 6:22 pm | URL: http://wp.me/p1SHGG-aP8

Comment    See all comments

Unsubscribe or change your email settings at Manage Subscriptions.

Trouble clicking? Copy and paste this URL into your browser:
http://www.therightplanet.com/2013/09/so-you-wanna-vote-in-mexico-huh/




--
--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
 
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "PoliticalForum" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to politicalforum+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Fwd: [New post] CIA Director John Brennan Has a New Benghazi Problem




Sard posted: "As the Benghazi scandal begins to heat up again, there appears to be some confirmation that CIA employees were required to sign non-disclosure agreements (NDA) that would prohibit them from speaking with Congress. Rep. Frank Wolf (R-VA) relayed what happe"

New post on therightplanet.com

CIA Director John Brennan Has a New Benghazi Problem

by Sard

As the Benghazi scandal begins to heat up again, there appears to be some confirmation that CIA employees were required to sign non-disclosure agreements (NDA) that would prohibit them from speaking with Congress. Rep. Frank Wolf (R-VA) relayed what happened to one such employee who refused to sign the NDA. Via Washington Free Beacon: A […]

Read more of this post

Sard | September 18, 2013 at 5:55 pm | URL: http://wp.me/p1SHGG-aP5

Comment    See all comments

Unsubscribe or change your email settings at Manage Subscriptions.

Trouble clicking? Copy and paste this URL into your browser:
http://www.therightplanet.com/2013/09/cia-director-john-brennan-has-a-new-benghazi-problem/




--
--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
 
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "PoliticalForum" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to politicalforum+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Fwd: [New post] FOX NEWS SHOCKER: Benghazi-Syria Connection




Sard posted: " Fox News has a blockbuster report which sheds further light on why the Obama administration has been involved in a massive cover up surrounding the Benghazi terrorist attack - and it raises serious questions about Obama's policies in Syria as well. New r"

New post on therightplanet.com

FOX NEWS SHOCKER: Benghazi-Syria Connection

by Sard

Fox News has a blockbuster report which sheds further light on why the Obama administration has been involved in a massive cover up surrounding the Benghazi terrorist attack - and it raises serious questions about Obama's policies in Syria as well. New reports indicate that rebels allied with al-Qaida were being trained in Benghazi and […]

Read more of this post

Sard | September 18, 2013 at 4:58 pm | URL: http://wp.me/p1SHGG-aP0

Comment    See all comments

Unsubscribe or change your email settings at Manage Subscriptions.

Trouble clicking? Copy and paste this URL into your browser:
http://www.therightplanet.com/2013/09/fox-news-shocker-benghazi-syria-connection/




--
--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
 
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "PoliticalForum" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to politicalforum+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Fwd: Sex and Subsidies in the Nation's Capital







http://www.jewishworldreview.com/0913/McCaughey.php3

 

Sept. 18, 2013/ 14 Tishrei, 5774

Sex and Subsidies in the Nation's Capital

By Betsy McCaughey

Just when you think Washington politics couldn't get dirtier, Congress finds a new low. To hold onto their illegal Obamacare subsidy that no other American earning $174,000 could get, members of Congress are trying to silence the subsidy's chief critic, Sen. David Vitters, by dredging up a 2007 unproven accusation that Vitters patronized a prostitute before being elected to the Senate.

Shockingly, the cabal also proposes that any member of Congress who votes for Vitter's proposal would be ineligible for the subsidy if Vitter fails and the subsidy stays. Has anyone in Congress read the Constitution? You can't make a lawmaker's future remuneration dependent on how he votes.

At the center of this tawdry cabal are none other than the chairman of the Senate Ethics Committee, Barbara Boxer and Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D. Nevada).

Here are the facts behind the stench:

The Affordable Care Act Sect. 1312(d) requires that members of Congress and their staffs enroll in the health plans offered on the exchanges. The thinking behind that provision is that what's good enough for the public ought to be good enough for Congress. It sounded good in 2010, when the law was enacted, but now politicians are getting cold feet.

Until now, members of Congress received a 75 percent subsidy funded by taxpayers to enroll in the Federal Health Benefits Program. Signing up for Obamacare will cost them thousands of dollars because the law does not entitle anyone earning $174,000 (base salary for Congress) to get a subsidy. Yikes! Congress doesn't think the Affordable Care Act is affordable for them.

Just before Congress' August recess, Republican and Democratic leaders, including House Speaker John Boehner and Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, pressed President Obama to do something. Ignoring the fact that the president has no constitutional authority to change the law and arrange for a subsidy that will cost taxpayers at least $55 million a year, members of Congress put their self-interest first. The president complied and weaseled an illegal arrangement with the Office of Personnel Management to award members of Congress and their staff a 75 percent subsidy to pay for their own Obamacare health plans. It's in a new official OPM ruling.

 

 

Shockingly, there's still a handful of lawmakers with scruples. Vitters, along with Sens. Mike Enzi, Ron Johnson Jim Inhofe and Mike Lee held up a Senate vote last week on an unrelated energy bill by trying to attach an amendment eliminating Congress's Obamacare subsidy. In the House, Rep. Ron DeSantis offered the same measure.

"This legislation blows the whistle on this all-too-familiar Washington game of putting the ruling class first," said DeSantis.

Don't depend on the subsidy's supporters to defend it on the merits. There are none. Instead, according to draft legislation obtained by Politico, Democrats are weighing whether to eliminate health care subsidies for lawmakers for whom there is "probable cause" that they patronized prostitutes, or to deny the subsidy to lawmakers who vote for Vitter's amendment.

"Harry Reid is acting like an old-time Vegas mafia thug, and a desperate one at that," Vitter said in a statement. "This just shows how far Washington insiders will go to protect their special Obamacare exemption."

These goings-on help to explain why Congress's job approval rating is 11 percent approve, versus 75 percent disapprove (Fox 9/6 to 9/8).

Congress already lavishes itself with perks most Americans would find disgusting: private elevators, private gyms, free parking at airports and large office budgets. When a member or former member dies, even of old age, the family is awarded the member's salary for a year. But when a member of our armed services dies in battle, that family gets far less.

The lesson: Congress looks out for itself, not for us. It's time to clean the Augean stables. The Election Day 2014 is coming none too soon.

 



__._,_.___





   
__,_._,___


--
--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
 
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "PoliticalForum" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to politicalforum+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Fwd: Media Use New Term 'Gun Reform' to Attack 2nd Amendment






http://www.rightsidenews.com/2013091733210/editorial/us-opinion-and-editorial/media-aim-new-term-gun-reform-to-attack-2nd-amendment.html

 

Media Aim New Term 'Gun Reform' to Attack 2nd Amendment

17 September 2013 13:20

Written by Kristine Marsh

Letterman uses propaganda expression 12 times in 3 weeks to push gun control.

The American media have long supported gun control, but they have increased their attacks on the gun industry since the Newtown shooting in December with a careful shift in the language they use. The term is likely to gain even more use following the shooting in D.C.'s Navy Yard.

While the commonplace "gun control" has an aggressive connotation to it, and rightfully so, liberals have attempted to replace it with the softer-sounding "gun reform" to make their agenda more acceptable. And the print and broadcast media have followed suit in adopting the expression. An Agence France-Presse piece, published just hours after the Navy Yard attack, called anti-gun Sen. Dianne Feinstein a "Senate gun-reform advocate."

The term "gun reform" was mentioned just 25 times in print in three top newspapers – The Los Angeles Times, The New York Times and The Washington Post – from 1986- April 14, 2012. From April to December 2012, the term did not make an appearance at all until the Newtown tragedy December 14. After that, the three papers have aggressively used the term at rate faster than ever before. In just the past eight months since Newtown, these three papers have used "gun reform" 23 times, nearly as many times as they had used it in the 26 years prior.

ABC, NBC, and CBS also adopted the politically correct term, using it in 10 different morning and evening weekday broadcasts since January. NBC anchor Ann Curry twice used the expression when asking a Newtown parent about gun control on an Aug. 21 "Nightly News" broadcast. "In the eight months since they last saw their children, Newtown parents have campaigned for gun reform. It passed in two states, Connecticut and Colorado, but failed at the federal level," she explained. "What was your reaction when the federal legislation failed for gun reform?" she inquired. By contrast, there was only one mention of "gun reform" in the weekday broadcasts since 1996.

"Gun reform" has cropped up all across the media – from CNBC to the "Late Show with David Letterman." Letterman used the expression 12 separate nights from late April to early May as he openly joined the anti-gun crusade. He mocked one Republican senator as "the Stooge of the Night" during a May 9 skit where he exaggerated gun poll results. "Saxby Chambliss, Georgia senator voted no on gun reform legislation despite the fact that 91 percent of voters in his state, 91 percent of voters in his state wanted background checks for gun buyers." Letterman even joked that Chambliss "sells ammo door to door."

More openly anti-gun media have also adopted the term On MSNBC, host Rachel Maddow told her audience that "one Democratic former governor one Republican former governor, Christine Todd Whitman, are urging Chris Christie to go ahead and sign the remaining five gun reform bills" available in New Jersey.

Fellow MSNBC host Melissa Harris Perry echoed the term during an Aug. 3 appearance, saying Newtown parents were "bringing their determination along with their broken hearts to Washington, to advocate for gun reform." In all, the term has been used on five separate MSNBC shows since Aug. 1.

Democrat politicians and radical gun control groups both started using other terms instead of gun control before the media did.

Moms Demand Action publically admitted to The Washington Post in February that it would not use the term "gun control" anymore and preferred to use phrases like "common-sense gun regulations" or "common-sense reforms" instead.

Not coincidentally, in a speech just two months later addressed to the Newtown families, President Obama used a similar phrase to complain that "a minority in the Senate" had "blocked common-sense gun reforms even while these families looked on from the Senate gallery." These statements came after the Senate had voted down the Manchin-Toomey background checks on April 17.

Richard M. Aborn, president of the gun-control group Citizens Crime Commission of New York, told The New York Times that he "prefers to use gun reform instead of gun control." Aborn, like many of the gun control groups, pitted the struggle for change in gun laws against the strong control of the NRA in an article entitled "Shaping a Gun Reform Agenda That Includes Teenagers and Handguns" from February 24.

The media have joined in the attacks against the gun industry, particularly The New York Times and Washington Post. In an editorial entitled, "The Diversionary Tactics of the Gun Lobby" Times writer Dorothy Samuels blamed the NRA for blocking "meaningful gun reforms" that would've prevented the massacre in Newtown, Conn.

Washington Post columnist E.J. Dionne has pushed for gun reform for years in his pieces. One, on March 17, 2011, in which she called for the President to "stand up to the bullies of the NRA" Another piece in April of this year repeated the term.

A Washington Post e-book called "Guns in America" also used the term to describe the actions of the Obama administration. "After the mass shooting in Sandy Hook, the Obama Administration proposed some of the most-sweeping gun reforms in decades," it argued.

The New York Times ran an editorial on April 14, 2012, attacking the gun industry in a piece entitled "Republicans and the Gun Lobby" that opened with the following slam against the NRA:

"Republican politicians gathering at the National Rifle Association convention in St. Louis are eagerly pandering to a powerful political lobby that is intent on making the nation's gun laws weaker and more riddled with more dangerous loopholes." Later in the article, the newspaper described the aggressively anti-gun group, Mayors Against Illegal Guns, as "a national gun reform group."

While The New York Times can complain that the NRA has a strong sway in politics in this country, it softened the radical nature of Bloomberg's Mayors Against Illegal Guns ("MAIG") as being a "gun reform" group.

Yet Bloomberg's MAIG has made his anti-gun industry views plain in the past:

"I think I have a responsibility, and I think you and all of your viewers have responsibilities, to try to make this country safer for our families and for each other. And if I can do that by spending some money and taking the NRA from being the only voice to being one of the voices so the public can really understand the issues then I think my money would be well spent."

But for all the attention the left gives to the money the NRA and gun industry receives, anti-gun groups like the Brady Campaign have received millions of dollars by liberal billionaires like George Soros to push the gun industry out of business.

— Kristine Marsh is a Staff Writer at the Media Research Center







   
__,_._,___


--
--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
 
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "PoliticalForum" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to politicalforum+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Fwd: [New post] Florida Police Jail Man For Protesting Red Light Cameras




Harold posted: "Mark E. Schmidter9/17/2013Source .....Man arrested for petitioning the Apopka, Florida city government to end red light cameras. Police in Apopka, Florida arrested a man on Saturday morning for distributing a petition that would put the issue of ending"
Respond to this post by replying above this line

New post on ACGR's "News with Attitude"

Florida Police Jail Man For Protesting Red Light Cameras

by Harold

Mark E. Schmidter 9/17/2013 Source ..... Man arrested for petitioning the Apopka, Florida city government to end red light cameras. Police in Apopka, Florida arrested a man on Saturday morning for distributing a petition that would put the issue of ending red light camera use to a public vote. Mark E. Schmidter, a 66-year-old commercial […]

Read more of this post

Comment    See all comments

Unsubscribe or change your email settings at Manage Subscriptions.

Trouble clicking? Copy and paste this URL into your browser:
http://a4cgr.wordpress.com/2013/09/18/03-1245/

Thanks for flying with WordPress.com



--
--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
 
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "PoliticalForum" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to politicalforum+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.