Tuesday, 19 November 2013

Re: [New post] Kerry Declares: ‘The Era of the Monroe Doctrine Is Over,’ Proceeds to Distort It

As some one that lives in a country outside the US I am wondering if he consulted with the other American Nations before he announced that the US would no longer support them in times of strife.


On Tuesday, November 19, 2013 8:31:40 AM UTC-6, Travis wrote:




Harold posted: "Joel B. Pollak11/18/2013Source ..... On Monday, Secretary of State John Kerry told the Organization for American States that "The era of the Monroe Doctrine is over." After the assembled delegates applauded, Kerry proceeded to misquote the doctrine as "a "
Respond to this post by replying above this line

New post on ACGR's "News with Attitude"

Kerry Declares: 'The Era of the Monroe Doctrine Is Over,' Proceeds to Distort It

by Harold

Joel B. Pollak 11/18/2013 Source ..... On Monday, Secretary of State John Kerry told the Organization for American States that "The era of the Monroe Doctrine is over." After the assembled delegates applauded, Kerry proceeded to misquote the doctrine as "a United States declaration about how and when it will intervene in the affairs of […]

Read more of this post

Comment    See all comments

Unsubscribe to no longer receive posts from ACGR's "News with Attitude".
Change your email settings at Manage Subscriptions.

Trouble clicking? Copy and paste this URL into your browser:
http://a4cgr.wordpress.com/2013/11/19/02-1273/

Thanks for flying with WordPress.com



--
--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
 
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "PoliticalForum" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to politicalforum+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Re: [New post] Kerry Declares: ‘The Era of the Monroe Doctrine Is Over,’ Proc...

Not like there is a lot left to colonize...and all of Europe is now allied...As long as he doesn't try to do away with "Speak softly and carry a big stick" who gives a rats ass. He probably does not know what the Monroe Doctrine is....


On Tuesday, November 19, 2013 11:48:30 AM UTC-6, Bill wrote:
John Kerry, America's own Neville Chamberlain!  An invitation to America's opponents that they are welcome in the America's. If these characters had been around in the 60's we would have ICBM's forty miles off Florida. These guys are so bloody arrogant to just announce to the world that we are throwing in the towel on a 200 year old policy that worked well for us. Whose side are they on??????? 
 
In a message dated 11/19/2013 6:31:42 A.M. Pacific Standard Time, baco...@gmail.com writes:




Harold posted: "Joel B. Pollak11/18/2013Source ..... On Monday, Secretary of State John Kerry told the Organization for American States that "The era of the Monroe Doctrine is over." After the assembled delegates applauded, Kerry proceeded to misquote the doctrine as "a "
Respond to this post by replying above this line

New post on ACGR's "News with Attitude"

http://a4cgr.wordpress.com/author/amcogore/

Kerry Declares: 'The Era of the Monroe Doctrine Is Over,' Proceeds to Distort It

by Harold

Joel B. Pollak 11/18/2013 Source ..... On Monday, Secretary of State John Kerry told the Organization for American States that "The era of the Monroe Doctrine is over." After the assembled delegates applauded, Kerry proceeded to misquote the doctrine as "a United States declaration about how and when it will intervene in the affairs of […]

Read more of this post

Comment    See all comments

Unsubscribe to no longer receive posts from ACGR's "News with Attitude".
Change your email settings at Manage Subscriptions.

Trouble clicking? Copy and paste this URL into your browser:
http://a4cgr.wordpress.com/2013/11/19/02-1273/

Thanks for flying with http://wordpress.com/ WordPress.com



--
--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
 
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "PoliticalForum" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to politicalforu...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

--
--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
 
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "PoliticalForum" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to politicalforum+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

No Treason


"The only idea they have ever manifested as to what is a government of consent, is this -- that it is one to which everybody must consent, or be shot."

No Treason
The Constitution of No Authority
by Lysander Spooner


XIX.

Now, what is true in Europe, is substantially true in this country. The difference is the immaterial one, that, in this country, there is no visible, permanent head, or chief, of these robbers and murderers who call themselves "the government." That is to say, there is no ONE MAN, who calls himself the state, or even emperor, king, or sovereign; no one who claims that he and his children rule "by the Grace of God," by "Divine Right," or by special appointment from Heaven. There are only certain men, who call themselves presidents, senators, and representatives, and claim to be the authorized agents, FOR THE TIME BEING, OR FOR CERTAIN SHORT PERIODS, OF ALL "the people of the United States"; but who can show no credentials, or powers of attorney, or any other open, authentic evidence that they are so; and who notoriously are not so; but are really only the agents of a secret band of robbers and murderers, whom they themselves do not know, and have no means of knowing, individually; but who, they trust, will openly or secretly, when the crisis comes, sustain them in all their usurpations and crimes.

What is important to be noticed is, that these so-called presidents, senators, and representatives, these pretended agents of all "the people of the United States," the moment their exactions meet with any formidable resistance from any portion of "the people" themselves, are obliged, like their co-robbers and murderers in Europe, to fly at once to the lenders of blood money, for the means to sustain their power. And they borrow their money on the same principle, and for the same purpose, viz., to be expended in shooting down all those "people of the United States" ­ their own constituents and principals, as they profess to call them ­ who resist the robberies and enslavements which these borrowers of the money are practising upon them. And they expect to repay the loans, if at all, only from the proceeds of the future robberies, which they anticipate it will be easy for them and their successors to perpetrate through a long series of years, upon their pretended principals, if they can but shoot down now some hundreds of thousands of them, and thus strike terror into the rest.

Perhaps the facts were never made more evident, in any country on the globe, than in our own, that these soulless blood-money loan-mongers are the real rulers; that they rule from the most sordid and mercenary motives; that the ostensible government, the presidents, senators, and representatives, so called, are merely their tools; and that no ideas of, or regard for, justice or liberty had anything to do in inducing them to lend their money for the war [i.e, the Civil War]. In proof of all this, look at the following facts.

Nearly a hundred years ago we professed to have got rid of all that religious superstition, inculcated by a servile and corrupt priesthood in Europe, that rulers, so called, derived their authority directly from Heaven; and that it was consequently a religious duty on the part of the people to obey them. We professed long ago to have learned that governments could rightfully exist only by the free will, and on the voluntary support, of those who might choose to sustain them. We all professed to have known long ago, that the only legitimate objects of government were the maintenance of liberty and justice equally for all. All this we had professed for nearly a hundred years. And we professed to look with pity and contempt upon those ignorant, superstitious, and enslaved peoples of Europe, who were so easily kept in subjection by the frauds and force of priests and kings.

Notwithstanding all this, that we had learned, and known, and professed, for nearly a century, these lenders of blood money had, for a long series of years previous to the war, been the willing accomplices of the slave-holders in perverting the government from the purposes of liberty and justice, to the greatest of crimes. They had been such accomplices FOR A PURELY PECUNIARY CONSIDERATION, to wit, a control of the markets in the South; in other words, the privilege of holding the slave-holders themselves in industrial and commercial subjection to the manufacturers and merchants of the North (who afterwards furnished the money for the war). And these Northern merchants and manufacturers, these lenders of blood-money, were willing to continue to be the accomplices of the slave-holders in the future, for the same pecuniary considerations. But the slave-holders, either doubting the fidelity of their Northern allies, or feeling themselves strong enough to keep their slaves in subjection without Northern assistance, would no longer pay the price which these Northern men demanded. And it was to enforce this price in the future ­ that is, to monopolize the Southern markets, to maintain their industrial and commercial control over the South ­ that these Northern manufacturers and merchants lent some of the profits of their former monopolies for the war, in order to secure to themselves the same, or greater, monopolies in the future. These ­ and not any love of liberty or justice ­ were the motives on which the money for the war was lent by the North. In short, the North said to the slave-holders: If you will not pay us our price (give us control of your markets) for our assistance against your slaves, we will secure the same price (keep control of your markets) by helping your slaves against you, and using them as our tools for maintaining dominion over you; for the control of your markets we will have, whether the tools we use for that purpose be black or white, and be the cost, in blood and money, what it may.

On this principle, and from this motive, and not from any love of liberty, or justice, the money was lent in enormous amounts, and at enormous rates of interest. And it was only by means of these loans that the objects of the war were accomplished.

And now these lenders of blood-money demand their pay; and the government, so called, becomes their tool, their servile, slavish, villanous tool, to extort it from the labor of the enslaved people both of the North and South. It is to be extorted by every form of direct, and indirect, and unequal taxation. Not only the nominal debt and interest ­ enormous as the latter was ­ are to be paid in full; but these holders of the debt are to be paid still further ­ and perhaps doubly, triply, or quadruply paid ­ by such tariffs on imports as will enable our home manufacturers to realize enormous prices for their commodities; also by such monopolies in banking as will enable them to keep control of, and thus enslave and plunder, the industry and trade of the great body of the Northern people themselves. In short, the industrial and commercial slavery of the great body of the people, North and South, black and white, is the price which these lenders of blood money demand, and insist upon, and are determined to secure, in return for the money lent for the war.

This programme having been fully arranged and systematized, they put their sword into the hands of the chief murderer of the war, [undoubtedly a reference to General Grant, who had just become president] and charge him to carry their scheme into effect. And now he, speaking as their organ, says, "LET US HAVE PEACE."

The meaning of this is: Submit quietly to all the robbery and slavery we have arranged for you, and you can have "peace." But in case you resist, the same lenders of blood-money, who furnished the means to subdue the South, will furnish the means again to subdue you.

These are the terms on which alone this government, or, with few exceptions, any other, ever gives "peace" to its people.

The whole affair, on the part of those who furnished the money, has been, and now is, a deliberate scheme of robbery and murder; not merely to monopolize the markets of the South, but also to monopolize the currency, and thus control the industry and trade, and thus plunder and enslave the laborers, of both North and South. And Congress and the president are today the merest tools for these purposes. They are obliged to be, for they know that their own power, as rulers, so-called, is at an end, the moment their credit with the blood-money loan-mongers fails. They are like a bankrupt in the hands of an extortioner. They dare not say nay to any demand made upon them. And to hide at once, if possible, both their servility and crimes, they attempt to divert public attention, by crying out that they have "Abolished Slavery!" That they have "Saved the Country!" That they have "Preserved our Glorious Union!" and that, in now paying the "National Debt," as they call it (as if the people themselves, ALL OF THEM WHO ARE TO BE TAXED FOR ITS PAYMENT, had really and voluntarily joined in contracting it), they are simply "Maintaining the National Honor!"

By "maintaining the national honor," they mean simply that they themselves, open robbers and murderers, assume to be the nation, and will keep faith with those who lend them the money necessary to enable them to crush the great body of the people under their feet; and will faithfully appropriate, from the proceeds of their future robberies and murders, enough to pay all their loans, principal and interest.

The pretense that the "abolition of slavery" was either a motive or justification for the war, is a fraud of the same character with that of "maintaining the national honor." Who, but such usurpers, robbers, and murderers as they, ever established slavery? Or what government, except one resting upon the sword, like the one we now have, was ever capable of maintaining slavery? And why did these men abolish slavery? Not from any love of liberty in general ­ not as an act of justice to the black man himself, but only "as a war measure," and because they wanted his assistance, and that of his friends, in carrying on the war they had undertaken for maintaining and intensifying that political, commercial, and industrial slavery, to which they have subjected the great body of the people, both black and white. And yet these imposters now cry out that they have abolished the chattel slavery of the black man ­ although that was not the motive of the war ­ as if they thought they could thereby conceal, atone for, or justify that other slavery which they were fighting to perpetuate, and to render more rigorous and inexorable than it ever was before. There was no difference of principle ­ but only of degree ­ between the slavery they boast they have abolished, and the slavery they were fighting to preserve; for all restraints upon men's natural liberty, not necessary for the simple maintenance of justice, are of the nature of slavery, and differ >from each other only in degree.

If their object had really been to abolish slavery, or maintain liberty or justice generally, they had only to say: All, whether white or black, who want the protection of this government, shall have it; and all who do not want it, will be left in peace, so long as they leave us in peace. Had they said this, slavery would necessarily have been abolished at once; the war would have been saved; and a thousand times nobler union than we have ever had would have been the result. It would have been a voluntary union of free men; such a union as will one day exist among all men, the world over, if the several nations, so called, shall ever get rid of the usurpers, robbers, and murderers, called governments, that now plunder, enslave, and destroy them.

Still another of the frauds of these men is, that they are now establishing, and that the war was designed to establish, "a government of consent." The only idea they have ever manifested as to what is a government of consent, is this ­ that it is one to which everybody must consent, or be shot. This idea was the dominant one on which the war was carried on; and it is the dominant one, now that we have got what is called "peace."

Their pretenses that they have "Saved the Country," and "Preserved our Glorious Union," are frauds like all the rest of their pretenses. By them they mean simply that they have subjugated, and maintained their power over, an unwilling people. This they call "Saving the Country"; as if an enslaved and subjugated people ­ or as if any people kept in subjection by the sword (as it is intended that all of us shall be hereafter) ­ could be said to have any country. This, too, they call "Preserving our Glorious Union"; as if there could be said to be any Union, glorious or inglorious, that was not voluntary. Or as if there could be said to be any union between masters and slaves; between those who conquer, and those who are subjugated.

All these cries of having "abolished slavery," of having "saved the country," of having "preserved the union," of establishing "a government of consent," and of "maintaining the national honor," are all gross, shameless, transparent cheats ­ so transparent that they ought to deceive no one ­ when uttered as justifications for the war, or for the government that has suceeded the war, or for now compelling the people to pay the cost of the war, or for compelling anybody to support a government that he does not want.

The lesson taught by all these facts is this: As long as mankind continue to pay "national debts," so-called ­ that is, so long as they are such dupes and cowards as to pay for being cheated, plundered, enslaved, and murdered ­ so long there will be enough to lend the money for those purposes; and with that money a plenty of tools, called soldiers, can be hired to keep them in subjection. But when they refuse any longer to pay for being thus cheated, plundered, enslaved, and murdered, they will cease to have cheats, and usurpers, and robbers, and murderers and blood-money loan-mongers for masters.

http://jim.com/treason.htm

Only in America


 

 


Only in America
 
 
This is Canada 's Top Ten List of America 's Stupidity. Of course we look like idiots … because we are.
  
10) Only in America .. could politicians talk about the greed of the rich at a $35,000.00 a plate campaign fund-raising event.
 
9) Only in America .. could people claim that the government still discriminates against black Americans when they have a black President, a black Attorney General and roughly 20% of the federal workforce is black while only 14% of the population is black. 40+% of all federal entitlements goes to black Americans – 3X the rate that go to whites, 5X the rate that go to Hispanics!  
 
8) Only in America .. could they have had the two people most responsible for our tax code, Timothy Geithner (the head of the Treasury Department) and Charles Rangel (who once ran the Ways and Means Committee), BOTH turn out to be tax cheats who are in favor of higher taxes.
   
7) Only in America .. can they have terrorists kill people in the name of Allah and have the media primarily react by fretting that Muslims might be harmed by the backlash.
 
6) Only in America ... would they make people who want to legally become American citizens wait for years in their home countries and pay tens of thousands of dollars for the privilege, while they discuss letting anyone who sneaks into the country illegally just 'magically' become American citizens.
 
5) Only in America .. could the people who believe in balancing the budget and sticking by the country's Constitution be thought of as "extremists."

4) Only in America ... could you need to present a driver's license to cash a check or buy alcohol, but not to vote.
3) Only in America ... could people demand the government investigate whether oil companies are gouging the public because the price of gas went up when the return on equity invested in a major U.S. oil company (Marathon Oil) is less than half of a company making tennis shoes (Nike).
 
2) Only in America .. could the government collect more tax dollars from the people than any nation in recorded history, still spend a Trillion dollars more than it has per year - for total spending of $7-Million PER MINUTE, and complain that it doesn't have nearly enough money.
 
1) Only in America .. could the rich people - who pay 86% of all income taxes - be accused of not paying their "fair share" by people who don't pay any income taxes at all.




 





=

Gettysburg Address: Still Balderdash After 150 Years


Gettysburg Address: Still Balderdash After 150 Years
By Jim
November 19, 2013

I am mystified by all the whooping on the 150th anniversary of the Gettysburg Address.  Most of the commentators seem to believe that Lincoln was an honest man touting the highest ideals.

Massachusetts abolitionist Lysander Spooner offered the most concise refutation to President Lincoln's claim that the Civil War was fought to preserve a "government by consent." Spooner observed, "The only idea . . . ever manifested as to what is a government of consent, is this­that it is one to which everybody must consent, or be shot."

The main lesson from the Gettysburg address is – the more vehemently a president equates democracy with freedom, the greater the danger he likely poses to Americans' rights. Lincoln was by far the most avid champion of democracy among nineteenth century presidents­and the president with the greatest visible contempt for the Constitution and the Bill of Rights. Lincoln swayed people to view national unity as the ultimate test of the essence of freedom or self-rule. That Lincoln suspended habeas corpus, jailed 20,000 people without charges, forcibly shut down hundreds of newspapers that criticized him, and sent in federal troops to shut down state legislatures was irrelevant because he proclaimed "that this nation shall have a new birth of freedom, and that government of the people, by the people, for the people shall not perish from the earth."

The fact that warmongers like George W. Bush and Obama purport to idolize Lincoln should be a warning sign to attentive folks.

Lincoln's rhetoric cannot be judged apart from the actions he authorized to enforce his "ideals":

In a September 17, 1863, letter to the War Department, Gen. William Sherman wrote: "The United States has the right, and … the … power, to penetrate to every part of the national domain. We will remove and destroy every obstacle ­ if need be, take every life, every acre of land, every particle of property, everything that to us seems proper." President Lincoln liked Sherman's letter so much that he declared that it should be published.

On June 21, 1864, before his bloody March to the Sea, Sherman wrote to the secretary of war: "There is a class of people [in the South] ­ men, women, and children, who must be killed or banished before you can hope for peace and order."

On October 9, 1864, Sherman wrote to Gen. Ulysses S. Grant: "Until we can repopulate Georgia, it is useless to occupy it, but the utter destruction of its roads, houses, and people will cripple their military resources." Sherman lived up to his boast ­ and left a swath of devastation and misery that helped plunge the South into decades of poverty.

General Grant used similar tactics in Virginia, ordering his troops "make all the valleys south of the Baltimore and Ohio railroad a desert as high up as possible." The Scorched Earth tactics the North used made life far more difficult for both white and black survivors of the Civil War.

Lincoln was blinded by his belief in the righteousness of federal supremacy.  His abuses set legions of precedents that subverted the vision of government the Founding Fathers bequeathed to America.


http://jimbovard.com/blog/2013/11/19/gettysburg-address-still-balderdash-150-years/

Fwd: [New post] Arkansas: SCOTUS allows bin Laden-praising, throat-slitting convict to keep sharia beard while contesting policy





creeping posted: "This pious Muslim convert also threatened jihad on jurors, served prison time for threatening President George W. Bush's daughters and wrote to jailers promising a deadly "jihad" inside the courtroom should "the verdict in my trial go south," among other "
Respond to this post by replying above this line

New post on Creeping Sharia

Arkansas: SCOTUS allows bin Laden-praising, throat-slitting convict to keep sharia beard while contesting policy

by creeping

This pious Muslim convert also threatened jihad on jurors, served prison time for threatening President George W. Bush's daughters and wrote to jailers promising a deadly "jihad" inside the courtroom should "the verdict in my trial go south," among other things. via U.S. justices say inmate can keep beard while contesting policy - chicagotribune.com. WASHINGTON, […]

Read more of this post

Comment    See all comments

Unsubscribe to no longer receive posts from Creeping Sharia.
Change your email settings at Manage Subscriptions.

Trouble clicking? Copy and paste this URL into your browser:
http://creepingsharia.wordpress.com/2013/11/19/scotus-allows-muslim-convict-who-slit-girlfriends-throat-praised-bin-laden-to-keep-beard-while-contesting-policy/

Thanks for flying with WordPress.com



--
--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
 
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "PoliticalForum" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to politicalforum+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Fwd: Law Enforcement Officers Per Capita for Cities, Local Departments






GOVERNING Data 

·  Law Enforcement Officers Per Capita for Cities, Local Departments

The following table shows the number of total full-time law enforcement employees and officers per agency in 2010, as reported to the FBI's Uniform Crime Reporting Program. Columns on the right show the number of police employees and officers per 10,000 residents. Click column headings to sort the data.

Employee totals for the most populous 100 localities reporting data are listed.

 

Search: [          ]

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

City

State

Population

All Law Enforcement Employees

Total Officers

Employees / 10K Pop.

Officers / 10K Pop.

Albuquerque

New Mexico

545,389

1,441

1,055

26.4

19.3

Anaheim

California

338,492

548

389

16.2

11.5

Anchorage

Alaska

290,334

526

373

18.1

12.8

Arlington

Texas

383,715

817

629

21.3

16.4

Atlanta

Georgia

536,472

1,973

1,612

36.8

30.0

Aurora

Colorado

323,483

765

644

23.6

19.9

Austin

Texas

796,310

2,141

1,605

26.9

20.2

Bakersfield

California

333,458

469

349

14.1

10.5

Baltimore

Maryland

639,929

3,503

2,960

54.7

46.3

Baton Rouge

Louisiana

226,001

832

728

36.8

32.2

Birmingham

Alabama

231,009

1,163

858

50.3

37.1

Boise

Idaho

205,902

364

296

17.7

14.4

Boston

Massachusetts

644,064

2,680

2,094

41.6

32.5

Buffalo

New York

265,128

918

768

34.6

29.0

Chandler

Arizona

241,826

478

320

19.8

13.2

Charlotte-Mecklenburg

North Carolina

797,733

2,187

1,696

27.4

21.3

Chesapeake

Virginia

225,627

484

365

21.5

16.2

Chicago

Illinois

2,833,649

13,318

12,515

47.0

44.2

Chula Vista

California

229,060

312

230

13.6

10.0

Cincinnati

Ohio

332,365

1,214

1,090

36.5

32.8

Cleveland

Ohio

426,042

1,805

1,559

42.4

36.6

Colorado Springs

Colorado

397,886

894

617

22.5

15.5

Corpus Christi

Texas

287,559

657

445

22.8

15.5

Dallas

Texas

1,306,775

4,241

3,666

32.5

28.1

Denver

Colorado

607,051

1,705

1,470

28.1

24.2

Detroit

Michigan

899,447

3,210

2,890

35.7

32.1

Durham

North Carolina

233,790

598

485

25.6

20.7

El Paso

Texas

624,322

1,279

1,078

20.5

17.3

Fayetteville

North Carolina

208,263

518

366

24.9

17.6

Fort Wayne

Indiana

257,009

493

458

19.2

17.8

Fort Worth

Texas

746,433

1,918

1,505

25.7

20.2

Fresno

California

484,734

1,007

793

20.8

16.4

Garland

Texas

221,921

448

323

20.2

14.6

Gilbert

Arizona

215,215

320

214

14.9

9.9

Glendale

Arizona

245,387

553

408

22.5

16.6

Greensboro

North Carolina

257,237

746

641

29.0

24.9

Henderson

Nevada

264,280

550

346

20.8

13.1

Hialeah

Florida

217,995

401

342

18.4

15.7

Honolulu

Hawaii

950,268

2,554

2,066

26.9

21.7

Houston

Texas

2,280,859

7,054

5,351

30.9

23.5

Indianapolis

Indiana

825,072

1,913

1,648

23.2

20.0

Irvine

California

217,193

289

200

13.3

9.2

Irving

Texas

206,308

503

339

24.4

16.4

Jacksonville

Florida

822,414

3,310

1,751

40.2

21.3

Jersey City

New Jersey

244,201

984

831

40.3

34.0

Kansas City

Missouri

483,191

1,993

1,404

41.2

29.1

Laredo

Texas

230,674

501

419

21.7

18.2

Las Vegas Metro Police

Nevada

1,416,401

5,130

2,696

36.2

19.0

Lexington

Kentucky

300,069

623

544

20.8

18.1

Lincoln

Nebraska

259,672

410

325

15.8

12.5

Long Beach

California

462,267

1,252

889

27.1

19.2

Los Angeles

California

3,841,707

12,754

9,858

33.2

25.7

Louisville Metro

Kentucky

637,428

1,379

1,211

21.6

19.0

Lubbock

Texas

227,867

513

382

22.5

16.8

Madison

Wisconsin

238,224

548

443

23.0

18.6

Memphis

Tennessee

673,650

2,775

2,335

41.2

34.7

Mesa

Arizona

452,725

1,186

776

26.2

17.1

Miami

Florida

440,482

1,453

1,098

33.0

24.9

Milwaukee

Wisconsin

605,921

2,663

1,936

43.9

32.0

Minneapolis

Minnesota

385,704

1,009

880

26.2

22.8

Mobile

Alabama

255,178

766

523

30.0

20.5

Nashville

Tennessee

616,366

1,584

1,289

25.7

20.9

New Orleans

Louisiana

356,317

1,715

1,452

48.1

40.8

New York

New York

8,336,002

50,068

34,817

60.1

41.8

Newark

New Jersey

280,379

1,666

1,308

59.4

46.7

Norfolk

Virginia

234,100

842

759

36.0

32.4

North Las Vegas

Nevada

238,004

468

308

19.7

12.9

Oakland

California

409,723

935

674

22.8

16.5

Oklahoma City

Oklahoma

571,865

1,254

1,015

21.9

17.7

Omaha

Nebraska

464,628

918

789

19.8

17.0

Orlando

Florida

240,222

939

719

39.1

29.9

Philadelphia

Pennsylvania

1,558,378

7,532

6,734

48.3

43.2

Phoenix

Arizona

1,544,427

4,198

3,146

27.2

20.4

Pittsburgh

Pennsylvania

312,737

954

887

30.5

28.4

Plano

Texas

278,244

495

332

17.8

11.9

Portland

Oregon

564,392

1,186

957

21.0

17.0

Raleigh

North Carolina

419,700

883

770

21.0

18.3

Reno

Nevada

222,242

392

323

17.6

14.5

Riverside

California

301,859

512

361

17.0

12.0

Sacramento

California

472,469

1,019

696

21.6

14.7

San Antonio

Texas

1,392,198

2,949

2,303

21.2

16.5

San Diego

California

1,313,433

2,516

1,863

19.2

14.2

San Francisco

California

818,594

2,629

2,250

32.1

27.5

San Jose

California

970,252

1,624

1,259

16.7

13.0

Santa Ana

California

340,240

623

353

18.3

10.4

Savannah-Chatham Metro

Georgia

210,744

808

579

38.3

27.5

Scottsdale

Arizona

230,496

676

423

29.3

18.4

Seattle

Washington

620,195

1,861

1,344

30.0

21.7

St. Louis

Missouri

355,151

1,920

1,363

54.1

38.4

St. Paul

Minnesota

281,166

773

592

27.5

21.1

St. Petersburg

Florida

243,666

774

538

31.8

22.1

Stockton

California

292,047

532

342

18.2

11.7

Tampa

Florida

347,830

1,245

952

35.8

27.4

Toledo

Ohio

315,647

677

566

21.4

17.9

Tucson

Arizona

527,107

1,295

974

24.6

18.5

Tulsa

Oklahoma

393,412

822

736

20.9

18.7

Virginia Beach

Virginia

435,873

938

775

21.5

17.8

Washington

District Of Columbia

601,723

4,477

3,945

74.4

65.6

Wichita

Kansas

376,880

802

630

21.3

16.7

Winston-Salem

North Carolina

232,928

688

528

29.5

22.7

 



__._,_.___





   
__,_._,___


--
--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
 
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "PoliticalForum" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to politicalforum+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.